Utilization of Noncontrast Magnetic Resonance Lymphangiography for Selection of Effective Surgical Method in Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema
Author:
Park Joseph Kyu-hyung1ORCID, Choi Nakwon1, Beom Jaewon2, Lim Jae-Young2, Kang Yusuhn3, Nam Sun-Young1, Myung Yujin1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 300 Gumi-dong, Bundang-gu, Seongnam 07061, Republic of Korea 2. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam 07061, Republic of Korea 3. Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam 07061, Republic of Korea
Abstract
Background and Objectives: When considering surgery for patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL), it is crucial to determine which surgery will be most effective for the patient and establish the indications for each surgery. Our study retrospectively compared the results of preoperative noncontrast MR lymphangiography (NMRL) performed on the lymphedematous limb of patients before surgery, with the aim of analyzing whether preoperative NMRL can be used as a criterion for determining the type of surgery. Materials and Methods: From January 2020 to June 2022, a total of 138 patients with lymphedema underwent surgery at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital. All patients underwent preoperative NMRL imaging and were classified into stages 1–3 based on the MRI severity index using the authors’ previous reference. Three types of surgery, LVA, LVA + liposuction, and LVA + VLNT, were conducted on all patients. The effectiveness of the surgery was evaluated one year postoperatively using the interlimb volume difference before and after surgery, the fluid volume of the edematous limb measured by bioimpedance spectroscopy, and the subjective satisfaction of the patients through the Lymph Q questionnaire. Results: In this study, out of a total of 138 patients, 26 (19%) were MRI stage 1, 62 (45%) were stage 2, and 50 (36%) were stage 3. Of the 83 patients who underwent LVA surgery, the greatest decrease in interlimb volume difference was observed in stage 2 patients, and subjective satisfaction was also the most effective in stage 2. In the case of LVA + liposuction patients, a significant volume decrease and a high satisfaction were observed in stage 3 patients. In the case of LVA + VLNT patients, there was no difference in volume decrease according to the stage, but a greater decrease in body fluid volume was observed as the MRI severity index score increased through BIA. Conclusions: In conclusion, this study demonstrates that NMRL imaging is a useful modality for determining the most effective surgical method and predicting the surgical outcome in patients with lymphedema. This highlights the importance of using NMRL in the treatment planning of lymphedema patients.
Funder
Korea Health Industry Development Institute
Reference35 articles.
1. Mihara, M., Hara, H., Hayashi, Y., Narushima, M., Yamamoto, T., Todokoro, T., Iida, T., Sawamoto, N., Araki, J., and Kikuchi, K. (2012). Pathological steps of cancer-related lymphedema: Histological changes in the collecting lymphatic vessels after lymphadenectomy. PLoS ONE, 7. 2. Reduced incidence of breast cancer-related lymphedema following mastectomy and breast reconstruction versus mastectomy alone;Card;Plast. Reconstr. Surg.,2012 3. Lymphedema following breast cancer treatment and impact on quality of life: A review;Taghian;Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol.,2014 4. Supermicrosurgical lymphaticovenular anastomosis for the treatment of lymphedema in the upper extremities;Koshima;J. Reconstr. Microsurg.,2000 5. A prospective analysis of 100 consecutive lymphovenous bypass cases for treatment of extremity lymphedema;Yamamoto;Plast. Reconstr. Surg.,2014
|
|