A Real-World Cost-Effectiveness Study Evaluating Imaging Strategies for the Diagnostic Workup of Renal Colic in the Emergency Department

Author:

Kepka Sabrina12,Zarca Kevin34,Ohana Mickaël25ORCID,Hoffmann Anne1,Muller Joris6ORCID,Le Borgne Pierrick17ORCID,Andrès Emmanuel8ORCID,Bilbault Pascal17ORCID,Durand Zaleski Isabelle349ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Emergency Department, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, 1 Place de L’hôpital, CHRU of Strasbourg, 67091 Strasbourg, France

2. ICUBE UMR 7357 CNRS, Équipe IMAGeS, 300 Bd Sébastien Brant, 67400 Illkirch-Graffenstaden, France

3. Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, DRCI-URC Eco Ile-de-France, 1 Place du Parvis Notre Dame, 75004 Paris, France

4. Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Service de Santé Publique, Henri Mondor-Albert-Chenevier, 94000 Créteil, France

5. Radiology Department, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, 1 Place de L’hôpital, 67091 Strasbourg, France

6. Public Health Unit, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, 1 Place de L’hôpital, CHRU of Strasbourg, 67091 Strasbourg, France

7. UMR 1260, INSERM/Université de Strasbourg CRBS, 1 rue Eugene Boeckel, 67000 Strasbourg, France

8. Department of Internal Medicine, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, 1 Place de L’hôpital, 67091 Strasbourg, France

9. CRESS, INSERM, INRA, Université Paris-Est Créteil (UPEC), 94000 Créteil, France

Abstract

Introduction Both non-contrast Computed Tomography (CT) and ultrasound (US) are used for the diagnosis of renal colic in the emergency department (ED). Although US reduces radiation exposure, its diagnostic accuracy is inferior to that of CT. In this context, data regarding the cost and organizational impact of these strategies represent essential elements in the choice of imaging; however, they remain poorly documented. Aim of the study The aim of this study was to compare the costs and effectiveness of diagnostic workup by US and CT for patients consulting with renal colic in the ED. Methods We conducted a monocentric real-life retrospective study of patients consulting for a renal colic in an ED between 1 July 2018 and 31 December 2018. We estimated length of stay (LOS), total hospital costs at 60 days including ED, and initial and repeat admissions. Patients with initial US in the ED were compared to patients with initial CT using inverse probability weighting of the propensity score calculated from demographic variables, vital parameters, and clinical presentation. We calculated the incremental cost effectiveness ratio as the difference in costs by the difference in LOS. The variability of the results was assessed using non-parametric bootstrapping. Results In this study, of the 273 patients included, 67 were patients assessed with US and 206 with CT. The average costs were €1159 (SD 1987) and €956 (SD 1462) for US and CT, respectively, and the ED LOS was 8.9 [CI 95% 8.1; 9.4] and 8.7 [CI 95% 7.9; 9.9] hours for US and CT, respectively. CT was associated with a decreased LOS by 0.139 [CI 95% −1.1; 1.5] hours and was cost-saving, with a €199 [CI 95% −745; 285] reduction per patient. Conclusion When imaging is required in the ED for suspected renal colic as recommended, there is real-life evidence that CT is a cost-effective strategy compared to US, reducing costs and LOS in the ED.

Funder

French Emergency Society

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3