Reply to Mankowska et al. Comment on “Muth et al. Assessing Critical Flicker Fusion Frequency: Which Confounders? A Narrative Review. Medicina 2023, 59, 800”-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Reply to Mankowska et al. Comment on “Muth et al. Assessing Critical Flicker Fusion Frequency: Which Confounders? A Narrative Review. Medicina 2023, 59, 800”

Published:2023-10-31 Issue:11 Volume:59 Page:1929
ISSN:1648-9144
Container-title:Medicina
language:en
Short-container-title:Medicina

Author:

Muth Thomas¹,Schipke Jochen D.²^ORCID,Brebeck Anne-Kathrin³^ORCID,Dreyer Sven⁴^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Occupational, Social, Environmental Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany

2. Research Group Experimental Surgery, University Hospital Düsseldorf, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany

3. Artemis Augenklinik, 60314 Frankfurt, Germany

4. Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy, University Hospital Düsseldorf, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany

Abstract

First and foremost, we like to express our gratitude for the praise bestowed upon our narrative review [...]

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Medicine

Link

https://www.mdpi.com/1648-9144/59/11/1929/pdf

Reference3 articles.

1. Muth, T., Schipke, J.D., Brebeck, A.-K., and Dreyer, S. (2023). Assessing Critical Flicker Fusion Frequency: Which Confounders? A Narrative Review. Medicina, 59.

2. Mankowska, N.D., Sharma, R.I., Grzywinska, M., Marcinkowska, A.B., Kot, J., and Winklewski, P.J. (2023). Comment on Muth et al. Assessing Critical Flicker Fusion Frequency: Which Confounders? A Narrative Review. Medicina 2023, 59, 800. Medicina, 59.

3. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology (1996). Heart rate variability: Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation and clinical use. Circulation, 93, 1043–1065.