Affiliation:
1. Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Královské Vinohrady, 100 34 Prague, Czech Republic
2. Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, 100 00 Prague, Czech Republic
3. Anaesthesiology and Resuscitation Department, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, 140 21 Prague, Czech Republic
4. First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, 120 00 Prague, Czech Republic
5. Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, 140 21 Prague, Czech Republic
Abstract
Background and objectives: Recently, rapid progress has been made in the development of noninvasive methods for liver fibrosis assessment. The study aimed to assess the correlation between LSM and serum fibrosis markers to identify patients with advanced liver fibrosis in daily clinical practice. Methods: Between 2017 and 2019, 89 patients with chronic liver disease of various etiology, 58 males and 31 females, were enrolled in the study and underwent ultrasound examination, vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE), AST to Platelet Ratio Index (APRI score), Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) score, and enhanced liver fibrosis (ELF) test. Results: The diagnoses were as follows: NAFLD (30.3%), HCV (24.3%), HBV (13.1%), ALD (10.1%), other (7.8%). Their median age was 49 (21–79), and their median BMI was 27.5 (18.4–39.5). The median liver stiffness measurement (LSM) was 6.7 kPa (2.9–54.2 kPa), the median of the ELF test was 9.0 (7.3–12.6), and the median APRI was 0.40 (0.13–3.13). Advanced fibrosis assessed by LSM was present in 18/89 (20.2%) patients. The LSM values correlated with the ELF test results (r2 = 0.31, p < 0.0001), with the APRI score (r2 = 0.23, p < 0.0001), the age of the patients (r2 = 0.14, p < 0.001), and with the FIB-4 values (r2 = 0.58, p < 0.0001). The ELF test values correlated with the APRI score (r2 = 0.14, p = 0.001), the age (r2 = 0.38, p < 0.0001), and the FIB-4 (r2 = 0.34, p < 0.0001). By determining the confidence intervals of the linear model, we proved that patients younger than 38.1 years have a 95% probability of absence of advanced liver fibrosis when assessed by VCTE. Conclusions: We identified APRI and FIB-4 as simple tools for screening liver disease in primary care in an unselected population of patients. The results also showed that individuals younger than 38.1 years had a negligible risk of advanced liver fibrosis.
Reference33 articles.
1. European Association for Study of Liver, and Asociacion Latinoamericana para el Estudio del Higado (2015). EASL-ALEH Clinical Practice Guidelines: Noninvasive tests for evaluation of liver disease severity and prognosis. J. Hepatol., 63, 237–264.
2. GBD 2017 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators (2018). Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet, 392, 1789–1858.
3. Burden of liver disease in Europe: Epidemiology and analysis of risk factors to identify prevention policies;Pimpin;J. Hepatol.,2018
4. Increased risk of mortality by fibrosis stage in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis;Dulai;Hepatology,2017
5. European Association for the Study of the Liver (2021). EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on noninvasive tests for evaluation of liver disease severity and prognosis—2021 update. J. Hepatol., 75, 659–689.