Advancing Discharge Ratings: A Novel Approach Based on Observed and Derivable GIS Factors in Alluvial Systems

Author:

Alshehri Fahad12ORCID,Ross Mark1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620, USA

2. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Bisha, Bisha P.O. Box 67714, Saudi Arabia

Abstract

Depth–discharge rating is required at gauged and ungauged locations for hydrologic modeling of alluvial systems to evaluate streamflow and manage regional water resources. Spanning low to high-flow conditions, manual field measurements are used to develop discharge ratings at gauged locations, producing continuous flow data from automated water depth measurements. The discharge rating is dependent on channel geometry, stream slope, vegetation, roughness coefficient, sediment load, and bank stability. To construct discharge ratings for many locations within larger model domains (hundreds to thousands of km2), intensive GIS and manual (spreadsheet) data manipulation are often required. In this analysis, available USGS gauging stations and readily available GIS coverages were used to learn and implement a novel method to characterize the depth–discharge relationships for hydrologic modeling of larger or complex areas using commonly available data and normalization techniques. The improved procedure simply uses drainage area, channel slope, and channel width, readily derivable GIS data, to develop discharge ratings for gauged and ungauged sections. The discharge rating curves for 70 USGS streamflow gauges were reproduced using the procedure. Then, the produced and observed discharge rating curves were compared to evaluate the accuracy of the method. In the analysis of streamflow depth predictions, the average Root Mean Squared Error was recorded at approximately 0.38 m (≈1.24 ft), with an interquartile range between 0.21 m and 0.49 m. The Mean Error remained centered around 0 m, with interquartile values ranging from −0.24 m to 0.24 m.

Funder

Tampa Bay Water

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Water Science and Technology,Aquatic Science,Geography, Planning and Development,Biochemistry

Reference33 articles.

1. Global climate change and its impacts on water resources planning and management: Assessment and challenges;Sivakumar;Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess.,2011

2. A review on effectiveness of best management practices in improving hydrology and water quality: Needs and opportunities;Liu;Sci. Total Environ.,2017

3. Gupta, R.S. (2016). Hydrology and Hydraulic Systems, Waveland Press.

4. Ross, M.A., and Geurink, J.S. (2018). Integrated Hydrologic Model Version 3 Theory and Implementation, Tampa Bay Water.

5. A Review on Hydrological Models;Devia;Aquat. Procedia,2015

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3