Affiliation:
1. School of Physical Education, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China
2. Hunan University of Finance and Economics, Changsha 410021, China
Abstract
The chi-squared automatic interaction detector (CHAID) algorithm is considered to be one of the most used supervised learning methods as it is adaptable to solving any kind of problem at hand. We are keenly aware of the non-linear relationships among CHAID maps, and they can empower predictive models with stability. However, we do not precisely know how high its accuracy. To determine the perfect scope the CHAID algorithm fits into, this paper presented an analysis of the accuracy of the CHAID algorithm. We introduced the causes, applicable conditions, and application scope of the CHAID algorithm, and then highlight the differences in the branching principles between the CHAID algorithm and several other common decision tree algorithms, which is the first step towards performing a basic analysis of CHAID algorithm. We next employed an actual branching case to help us better understand the CHAID algorithm. Specifically, we used vehicle customer satisfaction data to compare multiple decision tree algorithms and cited some factors that affect the accuracy and some corresponding countermeasures that are more conducive to obtaining accurate results. The results showed that CHAID can analyze the data very well and reliably detect significantly correlated factors. This paper presents the information required to understand the CHAID algorithm, thereby enabling better choices when the use of decision tree algorithms is warranted.
Subject
General Mathematics,Engineering (miscellaneous),Computer Science (miscellaneous)
Reference20 articles.
1. Using Kaplan–Meier analysis together with decision tree methods (C&RT, CHAID, QUEST, C4. 5 and ID3) in determining recurrence-free survival of breast cancer patients;Ture;Expert Syst. Appl.,2009
2. A comparative study of decision tree algorithms for predicting stock prices;Liu;J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst.,2021
3. Rotation-Invariant Attention Network for Hyperspectral Image Classification;Zheng;IEEE Trans. Image Process.,2022
4. Li, Y., Ren, J., Yan, Y., Liu, Q., Ma, P., Petrovski, A., and Sun, H. (IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 2023). CBANet: An End-to-end Cross Band 2-D Attention Network for Hyperspectral Change Detection in Remote Sensing, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., in press.
5. Use of RSM and CHAID data mining algorithm for predicting mineral nutrition of hazelnut;Akin;Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult.,2017
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献