Affiliation:
1. University of Rijeka, Faculty of Engineering, Vukovarska 58, HR-51000 Rijeka, Croatia
2. Center for Artificial Intelligence and Cybersecurity, University of Rijeka, R. Matejcic 2, HR-51000 Rijeka, Croatia
Abstract
In the field of human–computer interaction (HCI), text entry methods can be evaluated through controlled user experiments or predictive modeling techniques. While the modeling approach requires a language model, the empirical approach necessitates representative text phrases for the experimental stimuli. In this context, finding a phrase set with the best language representativeness belongs to the class of optimization problems in which a solution is sought in a large search space. We propose a genetic algorithm (GA)-based method for extracting a target phrase set from the available text corpus, optimizing its language representativeness. Kullback–Leibler divergence is utilized to evaluate candidates, considering the digram probability distributions of both the source corpus and the target sample. The proposed method is highly customizable, outperforms typical random sampling, and exhibits language independence. The representative phrase sets generated by the proposed solution facilitate a more valid comparison of the results from different text entry studies. The open source implementation enables the easy customization of the GA-based sampling method, promotes its immediate utilization, and facilitates the reproducibility of this study. In addition, we provide heuristic guidelines for preparing the text entry experiments, which consider the experiment’s intended design and the phrase set to be generated with the proposed solution.
Subject
General Mathematics,Engineering (miscellaneous),Computer Science (miscellaneous)
Reference42 articles.
1. MacKenzie, I.S. (2013). Human–Computer Interaction: An Empirical Research Perspective, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.. [1st ed.].
2. Kristensson, P.O., and Vertanen, K. (2012, January 14–17). Performance Comparisons of Phrase Sets and Presentation Styles for Text Entry Evaluations. Proceedings of the IUI ’12, 2012 ACM International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, Lisbon, Portugal.
3. Theoretical upper and lower bounds on typing speed using a stylus and a soft keyboard;Soukoreff;Behav. Inf. Technol.,1995
4. The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement;Fitts;J. Exp. Psychol.,1954
5. Text entry using soft keyboards;Mackenzie;Behav. Inf. Technol.,1999