Affiliation:
1. Department of Animal and Range Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA
Abstract
Targets for finished livestock are often determined by expected fat, either subcutaneous or intramuscular. These targets are used frequently to improve eating quality. Lower intramuscular fat, lack of product uniformity, and insufficient tenderness can negatively impact beef acceptability. This study aimed to investigate the differences in gene expression that alter metabolism and intercellular signaling in the muscle and adipose tissue in beef carcasses at different fat endpoints. In this study, longissimus thoracis muscle samples and adipose tissue were collected at harvest, and RNA was extracted and then sequenced using RNAseq. Differential expression was determined using edgeR, and p-values were adjusted using the Benjamini–Hochberg method. A corrected p-value of 0.005 and log2 (fold change) of >1 were the threshold to identify differential expression. Comparison between intermuscular and subcutaneous fat showed no differences in the genes activated in the two adipose tissue depots, suggesting that subcutaneous fat was an adequate sample. Carcass data allowed the classification of carcasses by USDA quality grades (marbling targets). In comparing muscle from Standard and Choice carcasses, 15 genes were downregulated, and 20 were upregulated. There were 49 downregulated and 113 upregulated genes comparing adipose tissue from Standard and Choice carcasses. These genes are related to the metabolism of fat and energy. This indicates that muscle transcript expression varies less than adipose. In addition, subcutaneous fat can be used to evaluate transcript changes in fat. However, it is unclear whether these fat tissues can be used as surrogates for marbling.
Subject
General Veterinary,Animal Science and Zoology
Reference38 articles.
1. Meat standards and grading: A world view;Polkinghorne;Meat Sci.,2010
2. Effect of fat content on sensory characteristics of marbled beef from Japanese Black steers;Iida;Anim. Sci. J.,2015
3. Schumacher, M., DelCurto-Wyffels, H., Thomson, J., and Boles, J. (2022). Fat Deposition and Fat Effects on Meat Quality—A Review. Animals, 12.
4. Marbling Texture’s Effects on Beef Palatability;Vierck;Meat Muscle Biol.,2018
5. Structural changes in intramuscular connective tissue during the fattening of Japanese black cattle: Effect of marbling on beef tenderization;Nishimura;J. Anim. Sci.,1999