Affiliation:
1. Faculty of Informatics and Computer Science, University Union-Nikola Tesla, Cara Dušana 62-64, 11158 Belgrade, Serbia
2. Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Electronic Engineering, University of Niš, Aleksandra Medvedeva 14, 18104 Niš, Serbia
3. Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Priština, Knjaza Miloša 7, 38220 Kosovska Mitrovica, Serbia
Abstract
Buildings can be made more user-friendly and secure by putting “smart” design strategies and technology processes in place. Such strategies and processes increase energy efficiency, make it possible to use resources rationally, and lower maintenance and construction costs. In addition to using wireless technologies and sensors to improve thermal, visual, and acoustic comfort, “smart” buildings are known for their energy, materials, water, and land management systems. Smart buildings use wireless technologies and sensors to improve thermal, visual, and acoustic comfort. These systems are known for managing energy, materials, water, and land. The task of the study is to consider the indicators that form the basis of the framework for evaluating intelligent buildings. The indicators for the development of “smart” buildings are classified into six categories in this paper: green building construction, energy management systems, safety and security management systems, occupant comfort and health, building automation and control management systems, and communication and data sharing. The paper aims to develop a scoring model for the smartness of public buildings. In developing the scoring system, the decision-making process requires an appropriate selection of the optimal solution. The contents of the research are the methods known as the Pythagorean Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (PF-AHP), Interval Valued Pythagorean Fuzzy AHP with differences (IVPF-AHP d), and the proposed method Interval Valued Pythagorean Fuzzy AHP (IVPF-AHP p). The research focuses on the IVPF-AHP as one of the methods of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) and its implementation. The comparative analysis of the three presented methods indicates a significant degree of similarity in the ranking, which confirms the ranking similarity. The results highlight the importance of bioclimatic design, smart metering, ecological materials, and renewable energy systems.
Subject
Geometry and Topology,Logic,Mathematical Physics,Algebra and Number Theory,Analysis
Reference71 articles.
1. Can a small city be considered a smart city?;Lopes;Procedia Comput. Sci.,2017
2. Designing, planning, and managing resilient cities: A conceptual framework;Desouza;Cities,2013
3. (2023, January 10). Global Status Report 2016: Towards Zero-Emission Efficient and Resilient Buildings. Available online: https://www.unep.org/resources/report/global-status-report-2016-towards-zero-emission-efficient-and-resilient-buildings.
4. Towards sustainable smart cities: An empirical comparative assessment and development pattern optimization in China;Li;J. Clean. Prod.,2019
5. Milošević, M.R., Milošević, D.M., Stević, D.M., and Stanojević, A.D. (2019). Smart City: Modeling Key Indicators in Serbia Using IT2FS. Sustainability, 11.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献