Practical Consequences of Quality Views in Assessing Software Quality

Author:

Galli Tamas1ORCID,Chiclana Francisco12ORCID,Siewe Francois3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Artificial Intelligence (IAI), Faculty of Computing, Engineering and Media, De Montfort University, Leicester LE1 9BH, UK

2. Andalusian Research Institute on Data Science and Computational Intelligence (DaSCI), University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain

3. Software Technology Research Laboratory (STRL), Faculty of Computing, Engineering and Media, De Montfort University, Leicester LE1 9BH, UK

Abstract

The authors’ previously published research delved into the theory of software product quality modelling, model views, concepts, and terminologies. They also analysed this specific field from the point of view of uncertainty, and possible descriptions based on fuzzy set theory and fuzzy logic. Laying a theoretical foundation was necessary; however, software professionals need a more tangible and practical approach for their everyday work. Consequently, the authors devote this paper to filling in this gap; it aims to illustrate how to interpret and utilise the previous findings, including the established taxonomy of the software product quality models. The developed fuzzy model’s simplification is also presented with a Generalized Additive Model approximation. The paper does not require any formal knowledge of uncertainty computations and reasoning under uncertainty, nor does it need a deep understanding of quality modelling in terms of terminology, concepts, and meta-models, which were necessary to prepare the taxonomy and relevance ranking. The paper investigates how to determine the validity of statements based on a given software product quality model; moreover, it considers how to tailor and adjust quality models to the particular project’s needs. The paper also describes how to apply different software product quality models for different quality views to take advantage of the automation potential offered for the measurement and assessment of source code quality. Furthermore, frequent pitfalls are illustrated with their corresponding resolutions, including an unmeasured quality property that is found to be important and needs to be included in the measurement and assessment process.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Geometry and Topology,Logic,Mathematical Physics,Algebra and Number Theory,Analysis

Reference73 articles.

1. Kokol, P. (2022). Software Quality: How Much Does It Matter?. Electronics, 11.

2. Software Product Quality Models, Developments, Trends and Evaluation;Galli;SN Comput. Sci.,2020

3. Galli, T. (2022). Data Science Techniques for Modelling Execution Tracing Quality. [Ph.D. Thesis, Institute of Artificial Intelligence, Faculty of Computing, Engineering and Media, De Montfort University].

4. Software Quality: The Elusive Target;Kitchenham;IEEE Softw.,1996

5. Ouhbi, S., Idri, A., Fernández-Alemán, J.L., Toval, A., and Benjelloun, H. (2015). Proceedings of the HEALTHINF 2015—8th International Conference on Health Informatics, Proceedings; Part of 8th International Joint Conference on Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies, BIOSTEC 2015, SciTePress.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3