Practical Consequences of Quality Views in Assessing Software Quality
Author:
Galli Tamas1ORCID, Chiclana Francisco12ORCID, Siewe Francois3ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Institute of Artificial Intelligence (IAI), Faculty of Computing, Engineering and Media, De Montfort University, Leicester LE1 9BH, UK 2. Andalusian Research Institute on Data Science and Computational Intelligence (DaSCI), University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain 3. Software Technology Research Laboratory (STRL), Faculty of Computing, Engineering and Media, De Montfort University, Leicester LE1 9BH, UK
Abstract
The authors’ previously published research delved into the theory of software product quality modelling, model views, concepts, and terminologies. They also analysed this specific field from the point of view of uncertainty, and possible descriptions based on fuzzy set theory and fuzzy logic. Laying a theoretical foundation was necessary; however, software professionals need a more tangible and practical approach for their everyday work. Consequently, the authors devote this paper to filling in this gap; it aims to illustrate how to interpret and utilise the previous findings, including the established taxonomy of the software product quality models. The developed fuzzy model’s simplification is also presented with a Generalized Additive Model approximation. The paper does not require any formal knowledge of uncertainty computations and reasoning under uncertainty, nor does it need a deep understanding of quality modelling in terms of terminology, concepts, and meta-models, which were necessary to prepare the taxonomy and relevance ranking. The paper investigates how to determine the validity of statements based on a given software product quality model; moreover, it considers how to tailor and adjust quality models to the particular project’s needs. The paper also describes how to apply different software product quality models for different quality views to take advantage of the automation potential offered for the measurement and assessment of source code quality. Furthermore, frequent pitfalls are illustrated with their corresponding resolutions, including an unmeasured quality property that is found to be important and needs to be included in the measurement and assessment process.
Subject
Geometry and Topology,Logic,Mathematical Physics,Algebra and Number Theory,Analysis
Reference73 articles.
1. Kokol, P. (2022). Software Quality: How Much Does It Matter?. Electronics, 11. 2. Software Product Quality Models, Developments, Trends and Evaluation;Galli;SN Comput. Sci.,2020 3. Galli, T. (2022). Data Science Techniques for Modelling Execution Tracing Quality. [Ph.D. Thesis, Institute of Artificial Intelligence, Faculty of Computing, Engineering and Media, De Montfort University]. 4. Software Quality: The Elusive Target;Kitchenham;IEEE Softw.,1996 5. Ouhbi, S., Idri, A., Fernández-Alemán, J.L., Toval, A., and Benjelloun, H. (2015). Proceedings of the HEALTHINF 2015—8th International Conference on Health Informatics, Proceedings; Part of 8th International Joint Conference on Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies, BIOSTEC 2015, SciTePress.
|
|