Abstract
The government of Karnataka has resolved to promote and employ an increasing number of alternative fuels, particularly, wind energy. Selecting a windmill supplier is a key decision when developing a wind energy project, and investors must evaluate various qualitative and quantitative variables that interact symmetrically to discover the best source. As a result, a multi-criteria decision-making procedure is applied to choose a wind turbine provider for wind power projects. A variety of approaches have been used to address this judgment process, some of which were predicated on the use of multi-criteria judgment techniques alone or in conjunction with some different multiple-criteria decision approaches. In this study, the researchers advocated selecting windmill producers for geothermal power generation using a judgment method based on a spherical fuzzy system. After the analyses of the last stage of this research, turbine manufacturers for installations could be suggested. The purpose of this research was to develop a fuzzy multi-criteria foundation for choosing appropriate rotor makers for electricity production. Specialists can utilize the conclusions of this study to choose an appropriate windmill operator in other states, including for green initiatives of a similar nature.
Subject
Energy (miscellaneous),Energy Engineering and Power Technology,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Control and Optimization,Engineering (miscellaneous),Building and Construction
Reference23 articles.
1. Yager, R.R. Pythagorean fuzzy subsets. Proceedings of the Joint IFSA World Congress and NAFIPS Annual Meeting (IFSA/NAFIPS).
2. Mosadeghi, R. A Spatial Multi-Criteria Decision Making Model for Coastal Land Use Planning. Ph.D. Thesis, 2013.
3. A review of multi criteria decision making (MCDM) towards sustainable renewable energy development;Kumar;Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.,2017
4. A Novel Spherical Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process and Its Renewable Energy Application;Kutlu Gündogdu;Soft Comput.,2019
5. Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for ranking renewable energy sources in Taiwan;Lee;Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.,2018
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献