Psychological Distress in Low-Income and Economically Marginalized Populations in India: Protective and Risk Factors

Author:

Singh Dipti1,Nasir Shagufta2ORCID,Sharma Juhi3,Giménez-Llort Lydia24ORCID,Shahnawaz Mohammad Ghazi1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychology, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi 110025, India

2. Department of Psychiatry and Forensic Medicine, School of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Barcelona, Spain

3. Light Up-Emotions Matter Foundation, New Delhi 110096, India

4. Institut de Neurociències, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Barcelona, Spain

Abstract

Studies at the juncture of development economics and public health take on considerable responsibility in addressing inequality and related mental health distress. Mental healthcare in economically marginalized populations requires depicting the linkages between socioeconomic status and psychological distress. In the present work, a sequential mixed-methods design was used to study 190 people in such communities in India. Gender-dependent psychological distress was found according to the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K-10) with moderate distress in women (M = 26.30, SD = 9.15) and mild distress in men (M = 21.04, SD = 8.35). Regression analysis indicated that gender significantly predicted psychological distress, followed by age, marital status, and the level of education of the head of the family. The Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis of semi-structured interviews of the six women who scored the highest on the distress scale unveiled three master themes: (1) manifestation of psychological distress, (2) contextual challenges, and (3) sources of strength and resilience. Overall, participants reported a lack of resources, community violence, gender discrimination, and widespread substance use as major contributors to the ongoing distress. These findings can pave the way for future studies to expand beyond independent economic indicators and curate clinical interventions for culturally competent mental healthcare.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference85 articles.

1. Most people are not WEIRD;Henrich;Nature,2010

2. Beyond Western, Educated, Industrial, Rich, and Democratic (WEIRD) Psychology: Measuring and Mapping Scales of Cultural and Psychological Distance;Muthukrishna;Psychol. Sci.,2020

3. American Psychological Association (2023, October 05). Guidelines for Psychological Practice for People with Low-Income and Economic Marginalization 2019. Available online: www.apa.org/about/policy/guidelines-lowincome.pdf.

4. American Psychological Association (2007). Report of the APA Task Force on Socioeconomic Status, American Psychological Association. Available online: https://www.apa.org/pi/ses/resources/publications/task-force-2006.pdf.

5. Cultural Diversity and Mental Health: Considerations for Policy and Practice;Gopalkrishnan;Front. Public Health,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3