Beacon Success Rate versus Gateway Density in Sub-GHz Sensor Networks
Author:
Can Başak1ORCID, Karaoğlu Bora1ORCID, Potta Srikar1, Zhang Franklin1, Balanuta Artur1, Gencel Muhammed Faruk1ORCID, Bhat Uttam1, Huang Johnny1ORCID, Patankar Pooja1, Makharia Shruti1, Suryanarayanan Radhakrishnan1, Kandhalu Arvind1, Krishnamurthy Vijaya Shankar Vinay Sagar1
Affiliation:
1. Amazon Lab126, 1100 Enterprise Way, Sunnyvale, CA 94089, USA
Abstract
Multiple Gateways (GWs) provide network connectivity to Internet of Things (IoT) sensors in a Wide Area Network (WAN). The End Nodes (ENs) can connect to any GW by discovering and acquiring its periodic beacons. This provides GW diversity, improving coverage area. However, simultaneous periodic beacon transmissions among nearby GWs lead to interference and collisions. In this study, the impact of such intra-network interference is analyzed to determine the maximum number of GWs that can coexist. The paper presents a new collision model that considers the combined effects of the Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical (PHY) layers. The model takes into account the partial overlap durations and relative power of all colliding events. It also illustrates the relationship between the collisions and the resulting packet loss rates. A performance evaluation is presented using a combination of analytical and simulation methods, with the former validating the simulation results. The system models are developed from experimental data obtained from field measurements. Numerical results are provided with Gaussian Frequency Shift Keying (GFSK) modulation. This paper provides guidance on selecting GFSK modulation parameters for low bit-rate and narrow-bandwidth IoT applications. The analysis and simulation results show that larger beacon intervals and frequency hopping help in reducing beacon loss rates, at the cost of larger beacon acquisition latency. On the flip side, the gateway discovery latency reduces with increasing GW density, thanks to an abundance of beacons.
Subject
Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Biochemistry,Instrumentation,Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics,Analytical Chemistry
Reference33 articles.
1. (2020). IEEE Standard for Low-Rate Wireless Networks (Standard No. IEEE Std 802.15.4-2020). 2. Can, B., Karaoğlu, B., Bhat, U., Gencel, M.F., and Chen, T. (2022). Performance of Narrow Band Wide Area Networks with Gateway Diversity. Sensors, 22. 3. Assessing the Effectiveness of Channel Hopping in IEEE 802.15.4 TSCH Networks;Cena;IEEE Open J. Ind. Electron. Soc.,2023 4. Leonardi, L., Lo Bello, L., Patti, G., Pirri, A., and Pirri, M. (2023). Simulative Assessment of the Listen before Talk Adaptive Frequency Agility Medium Access Control Protocol for LoRaWAN Networks in IoT Scenarios. Appl. Syst. Innov., 6. 5. Performance Improvement of Random Access by Prioritizing Collisions;Kim;IEEE Access,2023
|
|