Oxidative Stress Reaction to Hypobaric–Hyperoxic Civilian Flight Conditions

Author:

Netzer Nikolaus C.1234,Jaekel Heidelinde5ORCID,Popp Roland6ORCID,Gostner Johanna M.5ORCID,Decker Michael7,Eisendle Frederik1,Turner Rachel1ORCID,Netzer Petra2,Patzelt Carsten4,Steurer Christian4,Cavalli Marco4,Forstner Florian4,Pramsohler Stephan23

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Mountain Emergency Medicine, Eurac Research, Noi Park Campus, Via Hypatia 2, 39100 Bozen, Italy

2. Hermann Buhl Institute for Hypoxia and Sleep Medicine Research, Department Psychology and Sport Science, University Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria

3. Division Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department Internal Medicine, University Hospitals, 89070 Ulm, Germany

4. Terra X Cube, Eurac Research, 39100 Bozen, Italy

5. Institute of Medical Biochemistry, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria

6. Sleep Medicine Work Group, Department Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospitals, University Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany

7. Institute for Aerospace Physiology, Department Physiology, Medical School, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44120, USA

Abstract

Background: In military flight operations, during flights, fighter pilots constantly work under hyperoxic breathing conditions with supplemental oxygen in varying hypobaric environments. These conditions are suspected to cause oxidative stress to neuronal organ tissues. For civilian flight operations, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) also recommends supplemental oxygen for flying under hypobaric conditions equivalent to higher than 3048 m altitude, and has made it mandatory for conditions equivalent to more than 3657 m altitude. Aim: We hypothesized that hypobaric–hyperoxic civilian commercial and private flight conditions with supplemental oxygen in a flight simulation in a hypobaric chamber at 2500 m and 4500 m equivalent altitude would cause significant oxidative stress in healthy individuals. Methods: Twelve healthy, COVID-19-vaccinated (third portion of vaccination 15 months before study onset) subjects (six male, six female, mean age 35.7 years) from a larger cohort were selected to perform a 3 h flight simulation in a hypobaric chamber with increasing supplemental oxygen levels (35%, 50%, 60%, and 100% fraction of inspired oxygen, FiO2, via venturi valve-equipped face mask), switching back and forth between simulated altitudes of 2500 m and 4500 m. Arterial blood pressure and oxygen saturation were constantly measured via radial catheter and blood samples for blood gases taken from the catheter at each altitude and oxygen level. Additional blood samples from the arterial catheter at baseline and 60% oxygen at both altitudes were centrifuged inside the chamber and the serum was frozen instantly at −21 °C for later analysis of the oxidative stress markers malondialdehyde low-density lipoprotein (M-LDL) and glutathione-peroxidase 1 (GPX1) via the ELISA test. Results: Eleven subjects finished the study without adverse events. Whereas the partial pressure of oxygen (PO2) levels increased in the mean with increasing oxygen levels from baseline 96.2 mm mercury (mmHg) to 160.9 mmHg at 2500 m altitude and 60% FiO2 and 113.2 mmHg at 4500 m altitude and 60% FiO2, there was no significant increase in both oxidative markers from baseline to 60% FiO2 at these simulated altitudes. Some individuals had a slight increase, whereas some showed no increase at all or even a slight decrease. A moderate correlation (Pearson correlation coefficient 0.55) existed between subject age and glutathione peroxidase levels at 60% FiO2 at 4500 m altitude. Conclusion: Supplemental oxygen of 60% FiO2 in a flight simulation, compared to flying in cabin pressure levels equivalent to 2500 m–4500 m altitude, does not lead to a significant increase or decrease in the oxidative stress markers M-LDL and GPX1 in the serum of arterial blood.

Funder

Hermann Buhl Institute

Eurac Terra X Cube

Eurac Institute for Mountain Emergency Medicine

Medical University of Innsbruck

University of Innsbruck Open Access Publication

Publisher

MDPI AG

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3