True Non-Contrast Phase versus Virtual-Non Contrast: “Lights and Shadows” of Dual Energy CT Angiography in Peripheral Arterial Disease

Abstract

(1) Background: The value of dual-energy CT angiography (DE-CTA) in the detection of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) has been widely recognized. We aim to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of virtual non-contrast (VNC) imaging of DE-CTA compared to true non-contrast phase (TNC). (2) Methods: Our Internal Review Board (IRB) approved prospective study enrolled 40 patients (28 men, 12 women; median age 69 y, range 41–93 y) who underwent lower extremity DE-CTA for symptomatic PAD. Mean attenuation values of TNC and VNC were obtained by placing circular regions of interest (ROI) at five levels from the aortic to the popliteal arterial lumen, reported in Hounsfield units (HU), and compared using a two-sample t-test. The subjective quality of VNC images was assessed by two independent radiologists with 10 and 4 years of CTA-imaging experience according to a 4-point scale and verified by the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Dose Length Product (DLP) values of each DE-CTA examination were also considered. (3) Results: Except for the external iliac artery, VNC attenuation values were significantly lower than the corresponding TNC values at all levels, with a mean difference ranging from 14.1 and 8.7 HU. At qualitative analysis, VNC images were considered excellent to diagnose in 40%, good in 50%, and sufficient in 10% of cases. No cases of non-diagnostic VNC imaging were reported. Avoiding the TNC phase, a mean reduction in DLP of 54% for each DE-CTA was estimated. (4) Conclusions: TNC and VNC images showed comparable reliability and diagnostic accuracy in the detection of PAD. VNC may be considered a promising substitute for TNC from the perspectives of dose reduction and workflow optimization.