Affiliation:
1. Digital Cultural Heritage Laboratory, Department of Land Management and Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Environmental Engineering and Land Surveying, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Balicka 253c, 30-198 Krakow, Poland
2. Department of Economics and Informatics, Faculty of Organization and Management, Silesian University of Technology in Gliwice, Akademicka 2A, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland
Abstract
New communication channels and methods for retrieving information can provide increasingly precise data describing how cultural heritage is perceived, protected, promoted, and shared. Many internet users search for cultural-heritage-related topics using online search engines and databases. The purpose of this study was to identify the context and frequency of cultural heritage topics in Google search engine queries. The primary hypothesis was that keywords used in Google searches related to cultural heritage would be much more diversified in English than in Polish, perhaps because Polish has many fewer internet users than English. The keywords were selected because of their frequent use in the research literature, popular science publications, and central and local government strategy documents. The research employed selected online applications. A total of 3690 keywords were collected, with 1634 (44.3%) in Polish and 2056 (55.7%) in English. The numbers of retrieved keywords were similar for all research tools, but an in-depth analysis identified certain differences in the functions of the tools. The “cultural heritage” keyword in Polish (“dziedzictwo kulturowe”) was found mostly in national, regional, and local contexts. English queries included topics related to cultural heritage protection, conservation, restoration, and management and the financial value of cultural heritage. Some queries focused on world cultural heritage. The research shows that Polish-speaking users and English-speaking ones were interested in similar phrases. Therefore, the thought processes of internet users may be independent of their language.
Funder
Ministry of Science and Higher Education for the Silesian University of Technology in Gliwice
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development,Building and Construction
Reference119 articles.
1. Tangible and Intangible Heritage: From Difference to Convergence;Munjeri;Mus. Int.,2004
2. Natural and Cultural Heritage;Lowenthal;Int. J. Herit. Stud.,2005
3. Król, K., and Zdonek, D. (2022). Initiatives to Preserve the Content of Vanishing Web Hosting. Sustainability, 14.
4. A Definition of Cultural Heritage: From the Tangible to the Intangible;Vecco;J. Cult. Herit.,2010
5. Ch’ng, E., Gaffney, V., and Chapman, H. (2013). Visual Heritage in the Digital Age, Springer.