Affiliation:
1. College of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, Shandong Agriculture and Engineering University, Jinan 250100, China
2. College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China
Abstract
There is a significant difference between the simulation effect and the actual effect in the design process of maize straw-breaking equipment due to the lack of accurate simulation model parameters in the breaking and processing of maize straw. This article used a combination of physical experiments, virtual simulation, and machine learning to calibrate the simulation parameters of maize straw. A bimodal-distribution discrete element model of maize straw was established based on the intrinsic and contact parameters measured via physical experiments. The significance analysis of the simulation parameters was conducted via the Plackett–Burman experiment. The Poisson ratio, shear modulus, and normal stiffness of the maize straw significantly impacted the peak compression force of the maize straw and steel plate. The steepest-climb test was carried out for the significance parameter, and the relative error between the peak compression force in the simulation test and the peak compression force in the physical test was used as the evaluation index. It was found that the optimal range intervals for the Poisson ratio, shear modulus, and normal stiffness of the maize straw were 0.32–0.36, 1.24 × 108–1.72 × 108 Pa, and 5.9 × 106–6.7 × 106 N/m3, respectively. Using the experimental data of the central composite design as the dataset, a GA–BP neural network prediction model for the peak compression force of maize straw was established, analyzed, and evaluated. The GA–BP prediction model’s accuracy was verified via experiments. It was found that the ideal combination of parameters was a Poisson ratio of 0.357, a shear modulus of 1.511 × 108 Pa, and a normal stiffness of 6.285 × 106 N/m3 for the maize straw. The results provide a basis for analyzing the damage mechanism of maize straw during the grinding process.
Funder
Program for Innovative Research Team in SDAEU
Reference37 articles.
1. Duque-Acevedo, M., Belmonte-Ureña, L.J., Yakovleva, N., and Camacho-Ferre, F. (2020). Analysis of the circular economic production models and their approach in agriculture and agricultural waste biomass management. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 17.
2. Esposito, B., Sessa, M.R., Sica, D., and Malandrino, O. (2020). Towards circular economy in the agri-food sector. A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 12.
3. The circular bioeconomy: Its elements and role in European bioeconomy clusters;Stegmann;Resour. Conserv. Recycl. X,2020
4. Wheat and maize-derived water-washed and unwashed biochar improved the nutrients phytoavailability and the grain and straw yield of rice and wheat: A field trial for sustainable management of paddy soils;Korai;J. Environ. Manag.,2021
5. Estimation of maize straw production and appropriate straw return rate in China;Liu;Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.,2022