Evaluating the Facial Esthetic Outcomes of Digital Smile Designs Generated by Artificial Intelligence and Dental Professionals

Author:

Ceylan Gülsüm1ORCID,Özel Gülsüm Sayın1,Memişoglu Gözde1,Emir Faruk2,Şen Sevgin3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul 34083, Türkiye

2. Department of Prosthodontics, Gülhane Faculty of Dentistry, Health Sciences University, Ankara 06010, Türkiye

3. Independent Researcher, Bursa 16200, Türkiye

Abstract

This study evaluates the preference rates for smile designs created by professionals or by Artificial Intelligence (AI) among dentists, dentistry students, and laypeople. Four cases with symmetrical and asymmetrical features were selected based on the Facial Flow (FF) concept from the database of the Smile Designer app regarding anatomical facial points. Two smile designs were created for each selected case: one using Artificial Intelligence (AI) and one created manually. An online survey assessed participants’ preferences for the different smile designs. The chi-square test “Pearson’s and Fisher’s exact test (P)” was used to analyze the survey data. A total of 628 people completed the study. Dentists preferred the manually-created smile design for the first three cases. For Case 4, dentists who used the Smile Designer program preferred the manually-created design (55.88%), while those who did not use the program preferred the AI-generated design (55.84%). There was a significant difference in esthetic perception between dentists and dental students (p = 0.001) and between dentists and laypeople (p = 0.001) for Case 1, only between dentists and dental students (p = 0.003) for Case 2, and only between dentists and laypeople (p = 0.001) for Case 3. Furthermore, we found that females (p = 0.007) and orthodontists (p = 0.025) had a higher preference for the AI-generated design in this case compared to males and other dental specialties for Case 3. While age, education level, and clinical experience did not significantly impact dentists’ preference for manually-created or AI-generated smile designs (p > 0.05), our results suggest that there were some differences in preference for Case 3. Overall, our findings suggest that the use of AI-generated smile designs for symmetric faces is acceptable to both dentists and laypeople and can offer time-saving benefits for clinicians.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes,Computer Science Applications,Process Chemistry and Technology,General Engineering,Instrumentation,General Materials Science

Reference26 articles.

1. Perception of buccal corridor space on smile aesthetics among specialty dentist and layperson;Pisulkar;J. Int. Soc. Prev. Community Dent.,2019

2. Evolution of aesthetic dentistry;Blatz;J. Dent. Res.,2019

3. Digitally Enhanced Esthetic Dentistry—From Treatment Planning to Quality Control;Coachman;J. Esthet. Restor. Dent.,2016

4. Application of three-dimensional digital simulated design and implementation in esthetic rehabilitation;Ye;Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi,2020

5. The application of parameters for comprehensive smile esthetics by digital smile design programs: A review of literature;Omar;Saudi Dent. J.,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3