Abstract
Inequities caused by a unilateral climate policy may threaten the sustainability of CO2 emission reduction efforts by countries and firms, thus endangering sustainable development for humans and the eco-environment. However, few studies have conducted ex-post evaluations on whether environmentally regulated firms receive external compensation such as subsidies, tax reductions, and loan support. Thus, this study investigates whether firms experiencing inequitable conditions under China’s Energy-Saving Quota Policy (ESQP) are financially compensated. It develops a balanced panel of data from 6189 ESQP-regulated and 6189 unregulated firms from 2010 to 2013, and combines a probit model with the difference-in-differences method to conduct empirical analysis. The results show that ESQP-regulated firms receive more subsidy income and lower tax rates than unregulated firms. Of the ESQP-regulated firms, companies with higher energy-saving burdens receive larger subsidies and lower financial expense ratios than those with lower burdens. Additionally, firms that complete their energy-saving quotas are compensated with larger subsidies and/or lower financial expense ratios and tax rates than those that fail to complete them. Finally, state-owned firms receive more subsidies than private ones. Unlike the emission trading schemes implemented worldwide that formulate an exemption mechanism (i.e., free or over-allocated allowances), the ESQP does not exempt regulated firms from their energy-saving responsibilities. Rather, regulated firms receive a greater amount of external compensation in exchange for their reductions in energy consumption.
Funder
Fujian Social Science Foundation;Innovation Strategy Research Project of Fujian science and Technology Department
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development,Building and Construction
Reference77 articles.
1. Targeted carbon tariffs: Export response, leakage and welfare;Bye;Resour. Energy Econ.,2017
2. Assessing the equity of carbon mitigation policies for transport in Scotland;Lucas;Case Stud. Transp. Policy,2014
3. Bierbrauer, F., Felbermayr, G., Ockenfels, A., Schmidt, K.M., and Südekum, J. (2021). A CO2-Border Adjustment Mechanism as a Building Block of a Climate Club, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW). Kiel Policy Brief, No. 151.
4. Climate policy and international trade: A critical appraisal of the literature;Jakob;Energy Policy,2021
5. Fragkos, P., Fragkiadakis, K., and Paroussos, L. (2021). Reducing the Decarbonisation Cost Burden for EU Energy-Intensive Industries. Energies, 14.