Surface Velocity to Depth-Averaged Velocity—A Review of Methods to Estimate Alpha and Remaining Challenges

Author:

Biggs Hamish1ORCID,Smart Graeme1,Doyle Martin2,Eickelberg Niklas3,Aberle Jochen3ORCID,Randall Mark4,Detert Martin5

Affiliation:

1. National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA), Christchurch 8011, New Zealand

2. Tasman District Council, Nelson 7050, New Zealand

3. Division of Hydraulic Engineering and River Morphology, Leichtweiß Institute for Hydraulic Engineering and Water Resources, TU Braunschweig, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany

4. Queensland Government, Mareeba, QLD 4880, Australia

5. Meisser Surveying AG, 7000 Chur, Switzerland

Abstract

The accuracy of discharge measurements derived from surface velocities are highly dependent on the accuracy of conversions from surface velocity us to depth-averaged velocity U. This conversion factor is typically known as the ‘velocity coefficient’, ‘velocity index’, ‘calibration factor’, ‘alpha coefficient’, or simply ‘alpha’, where α=U/us. At some field sites detailed in situ measurements can be made to calculate alpha, while in other situations (such as rapid response flood measurements) alpha must be estimated. This paper provides a review of existing methods for estimating alpha and presents a workflow for selecting the appropriate method, based on available data. Approaches to estimating alpha include: reference discharge and surface velocimetry measurements; extrapolated ADCP velocity profiles; log law profiles; power law profiles; site characteristics; and default assumed values. Additional methods for estimating alpha that require further development or validation are also described. This paper then summarises methods for accounting for spatial and temporal heterogeneity in alpha, such as ‘stage to alpha rating curves’, ‘site alpha vs. local alpha’, and ‘the divided channel method’. Remaining challenges for the accurate estimation of alpha are discussed, as well as future directions that will help to address these challenges. Although significant work remains to improve the estimation of alpha (notably to address surface wind effects and velocity dip), the methods covered in this paper could provide a substantial accuracy improvement over selecting the ‘default value’ of 0.857 for alpha for every discharge measurement.

Funder

NIWA

Ministry of Business Innovation and Employment

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Water Science and Technology,Aquatic Science,Geography, Planning and Development,Biochemistry

Reference79 articles.

1. Rantz, S. (1982). U.S. Geological Survey Water Supply Paper 2175, United States Government Printing Office.

2. Buchanan, T.J., and Somers, W.P. (1969). United States Geological Survey 1969, US Government Printing Office.

3. measuring stream discharge by non-contact methods: A Proof-of-Concept Experiment;Costa;Geophys. Res. Lett.,2000

4. Field assessment of noncontact stream gauging using portable surface velocity radars (SVR);Welber;Water Resour. Res.,2016

5. Large-scale particle image velocimetry for flow analysis in hydraulic engineering applications;Fujita;J. Hydraul. Res.,1998

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3