Abstract
The present study explored the susceptibility of maximizers to the effect of the specific information format—frequency vs. percentage—in a risk assessment task. One-hundred and fourteen participants were randomized into two experimental conditions: a frequency format and a percentage format. In both conditions, participants had to rate the level of risk that a mental patient would harm someone after his discharge from a mental health facility, based on the information reported in the psychologist’s assessment for that patient. In the frequency condition, the information was presented in terms of frequencies, whereas in the percentage condition the same information was presented in terms of percentage. Our experiment showed that resolute maximizers are less affected by the specific format of the task than fearful maximizers. Thus, we conclude that resolute maximizers are more normative decision-makers. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
Subject
Behavioral Neuroscience,General Psychology,Genetics,Development,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference36 articles.
1. A study of temporal estimation from the perspective of the mental clock model;Carmeci;J. Gen. Psychol.,2009
2. The effect of choice complexity on perception of time spent choosing: When choice takes longer but feels shorter;Fasolo;Psychol. Mark.,2009
3. Maximizing versus satisficing: Happiness is a matter of choice;Schwartz;J. Personal. Soc. Psychol.,2002
4. When is more really more? The effect of brands on choice overload in adolescents;Misuraca;J. Consum. Mark.,2021
5. Choice overload: A study on children, adolescents, adults and seniors / L’effetto del sovraccarico di scelta: Un’indagine su bambini, adolescenti, adulti e anziani;Misuraca;Ric. Psicol./Psychol. Res. J.,2021