Maximizers’ Susceptibility to the Effect of Frequency vs. Percentage Format in Risk Representation

Author:

Misuraca RaffaellaORCID,Faraci PalmiraORCID,Scaffidi Abbate CostanzaORCID

Abstract

The present study explored the susceptibility of maximizers to the effect of the specific information format—frequency vs. percentage—in a risk assessment task. One-hundred and fourteen participants were randomized into two experimental conditions: a frequency format and a percentage format. In both conditions, participants had to rate the level of risk that a mental patient would harm someone after his discharge from a mental health facility, based on the information reported in the psychologist’s assessment for that patient. In the frequency condition, the information was presented in terms of frequencies, whereas in the percentage condition the same information was presented in terms of percentage. Our experiment showed that resolute maximizers are less affected by the specific format of the task than fearful maximizers. Thus, we conclude that resolute maximizers are more normative decision-makers. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Behavioral Neuroscience,General Psychology,Genetics,Development,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Reference36 articles.

1. A study of temporal estimation from the perspective of the mental clock model;Carmeci;J. Gen. Psychol.,2009

2. The effect of choice complexity on perception of time spent choosing: When choice takes longer but feels shorter;Fasolo;Psychol. Mark.,2009

3. Maximizing versus satisficing: Happiness is a matter of choice;Schwartz;J. Personal. Soc. Psychol.,2002

4. When is more really more? The effect of brands on choice overload in adolescents;Misuraca;J. Consum. Mark.,2021

5. Choice overload: A study on children, adolescents, adults and seniors / L’effetto del sovraccarico di scelta: Un’indagine su bambini, adolescenti, adulti e anziani;Misuraca;Ric. Psicol./Psychol. Res. J.,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3