Vulnerability Assessment and Optimization Countermeasures of the Human–Land Coupling System of the China–Mongolia–Russia Cross-Border Transportation Corridor
-
Published:2023-08-20
Issue:16
Volume:15
Page:12606
-
ISSN:2071-1050
-
Container-title:Sustainability
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Sustainability
Author:
Wang Xinyuan12, Cheng Hao1, Li Fujia1, Avirmed Dashtseren3, Tsydypov Bair4, Zhang Menghan12ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China 2. College of Resource and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China 3. Institute of Geography and Geo-ecology, Mongolian Academy of Sciences, Ulaanbaatar 15170, Mongolia 4. Baikal Institute of Nature Management, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Ulan-Ude 670047, Russia
Abstract
In recent years, the conflicts of the human–land coupling system (HLS) in the cross-border transportation corridor areas have become increasingly severe, especially in the China–Mongolia–Russia Cross-Border Transportation Corridor (CMRTC). The vulnerability assessment of the HLS-CMRTC is the key scientific issue for regional sustainable development. Based on the nearly 20 years of a scientific expedition, we set the CMRTC as the study area, constructed the vulnerability assessment index system and quantitative model, assessed the vulnerability of the HLS-CMRTC, revealed the key influencing factors, divided vulnerability risk prevention zones, and proposed the targeted optimization countermeasures. This study found that: (1) The overall vulnerability pattern of the HLS-CMRTC showed a vulnerability level gradually increasing from south to north. (2) Permafrost instability risk, land desertification, temperature increase, and backward social development were key influences. (3) Vulnerability risk prevention zones were divided into four priority and two general zones. The targeted optimization countermeasures were proposed, such as establishing an ecological security barrier, carrying out collaborative ecological risk monitoring, and early warning. The conclusions could provide a decision-making basis for the study area to reduce the vulnerability of the HLS. They could also provide reference and scientific support for achieving sustainable development of the economy and environment in similar regions of the world.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China Science & Technology Fundamental Resources Investigation Program Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development,Building and Construction
Reference47 articles.
1. A Second Environmental Science: Human-Environment Interactions;Stern;Science,1993 2. Houghton, J.T., Ding, Y., Griggs, D.J., Noguer, M., van der Linden, P.J., Dai, X., Maskell, K., and Johnson, C.A. (2001). Climate Change: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability, IPCC. 3. Illustrating the coupled human–environment system for vulnerability analysis: Three case studies;Turner;Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,2003 4. A conceptual template for integrative human–environment research;Newell;Glob. Environ. Chang.,2005 5. Linkages between vulnerability, resilience, and adaptive capacity;Glob. Environ. Chang.,2006
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|