Abstract
In this work, it is demonstrated that straightforward implementations of the well-known textbook expressions of the off-axis magnetic field of a current loop are numerically unstable in a large region of interest. Specifically, close to the axis of symmetry and at large distances from the loop, complete loss of accuracy happens surprisingly fast. The origin of the instability is catastrophic numerical cancellation, which cannot be avoided with algebraic transformations. All exact expressions found in the literature exhibit similar instabilities. We propose a novel exact analytic expression, based on Bulirsch’s complete elliptic integral, which is numerically stable (15–16 significant figures in 64 bit floating point arithmetic) everywhere. Several field approximation methods (dipole, Taylor expansions, Binomial series) are studied in comparison with respect to accuracy, numerical stability and computation performance. In addition to its accuracy and global validity, the proposed method outperforms the classical solution, and even most approximation schemes in terms of computational efficiency.
Funder
COMET K1 centre ASSIC Austrian Smart Systems Integration 100 Research Center
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science
Reference32 articles.
1. Madenci, E., and Guven, I. (2015). The Finite Element Method and Applications in Engineering Using ANSYS®, Springer.
2. Pryor, R.W. (2009). Multiphysics Modeling Using COMSOL®: A First Principles Approach, Jones & Bartlett Publishers.
3. The FEniCS project version 1.5;Blechta;Arch. Numer. Softw.,2015
4. Schöberl, J. (2014). C++ 11 Implementation of Finite Elements in NGSolve, Institute for Analysis and Scientific Computing, Vienna University of Technology.
5. Smythe, W.B. (1988). Static and Dynamic Electricity, Hemisphere Publishing.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献