Abstract
Supporting policies to achieve a green revolution and ecological transition is a global trend. Although the maritime transport of goods and people can rightly be counted among the least polluting sectors, much can be done to further reduce its environmental footprint. Moreover, to boost the ecological transition of vessels, a whole series of international regulations and national laws have been promulgated. Among these, the most impactful on both design and operational management of ships concern the containment of air-polluting emissions in terms of GHG, NOx, SOx and PM. To address this challenge, it might seem that many technologies already successfully used in other transport sectors could be applied. However, the peculiar characteristics of ships make this statement not entirely true. In fact, technological solutions recently adopted, for example, in the automotive sector must deal with the large size of vessels and the consequent large amount of energy necessary for their operation. In this paper, with reference to the case study of a medium/large-sized passenger cruise ship, the use of different fuels (LNG, ammonia, hydrogen) and technologies (internal combustion engines, fuel cells) for propulsion and energy generation on board will be compared. By imposing the design constraint of not modifying the payload and the speed of the ship, the criticalities linked to the use of one fuel rather than another will be highlighted. The current limits of application of some fuels will be made evident, with reference to the state of maturity of the relevant technologies. Furthermore, the operational consequences in terms of autonomy reduction will be presented. The obtained results underline the necessity for shipowners and shipbuilders to reflect on the compromises required by the challenges of the ecological transition, which will force them to choose between reducing payload or reducing performance.
Subject
Ocean Engineering,Water Science and Technology,Civil and Structural Engineering
Reference50 articles.
1. Impact of 1, 2 and 4 °C of Global Warming on Ship Navigation in the Canadian Arctic;Mudryk;Nat. Clim. Chang.,2021
2. Brenna, M., Bucci, V., Falvo, M.C., Foiadelli, F., Ruvio, A., Sulligoi, G., and Vicenzutti, A. (2020). A Review on Energy Efficiency in Three Transportation Sectors: Railways, Electrical Vehicles and Marine. Energies, 13.
3. (2022, October 18). The 2020 World Merchant Fleet—Statistics from Equasis 2021. Available online: https://www.equasis.org/Fichiers/Statistique/MOA/Documents%20availables%20on%20statistics%20of%20Equasis/Equasis%20Statistics%20-%20The%20world%20fleet%202021.pdf.
4. (2022, October 18). CLIA 2021 Global Market Report 2022. Available online: https://cruising.org/-/media/clia-media/research/2022/2021-1r-clia-001-overview-global.ashx.
5. (2022, October 18). Cruise Industry Worldwide 2022. Available online: https://www.statista.com/topics/1004/cruise-industry/#topicHeader__wrapper.
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献