Affiliation:
1. Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA
2. Interdepartmental Microbiology Graduate Program, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA
Abstract
To tease apart differences between conventional cage (CC) and cage-free (CF) housing systems, this study focuses on the effects of excreta exposure and age by comparing microbial communities, intestinal permeability, and corticosterone in hens in enriched colonies (EC) and CF housing systems during early- and late-lay. Hens were randomly selected from two rooms of CF (n = 20) and EC (n = 20) at 35 and 76 weeks of age. One hour following an oral gavage of fluorescein isothiocyanate dextran (FITC-D), hens were euthanized, and ileal contents and blood were collected. Serum FITC-D using a fluorescent spectrophotometer and corticosterone using a commercial competitive ELISA kit were analyzed. Following DNA isolation from the ileum contents, the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene was sequenced. Sequence data were filtered in Mothur v1.43.0, followed by de novo operational taxonomic unit (OTU) clustering and classifying with the SILVA SSU v138 reference database. Serum FITC-D was altered by housing type, age of hens, and the interaction between housing type and age of hens (p < 0.001), with 76-week-old hens housed in EC having the highest FITC-D. Corticosterone increased with age (p = 0.023). Microbial community diversity measurements favored hens housed in the CF housing system as ileal contents tended to have increased species evenness (p = 0.008) and greater alpha diversity (p = 0.006). The majority of the over-representation of OTUs were associated with peak lay.
Funder
Iowa Agriculture and Home Economics Experiment Station (IAHEES) Project
USDA-ARS CRIS
USD/R&E
National Defense Education Program (NDEP)/BA-1
Reference52 articles.
1. Ward, J. (2014). From Battery Cages to Barns: A Cost-Benefit Analysis of a National Standard for Cage-Free Egg Production, University of Massachusatts Amherst.
2. Xin, H., Hayes, M., Ibarburu, M.A., Millman, S.T., Parsons, R.L., and Jung, H. (2012). A Comprehensive Assessment of Aviary Laying-Hen Housing System for Egg Production in the Midwest, National Agricultural Library.
3. Impact of Commercial Housing Systems and Nutrient and Energy Intake on Laying Hen Performance and Egg Quality Parameters;Karcher;Poult. Sci.,2015
4. Performance and Welfare of Laying Hens in Conventional and Enriched Cages;Tactacan;Poult. Sci.,2009
5. Influence of Different Litter Materials on Cecal Microbiota Colonization in Broiler Chickens;Torok;Poult. Sci.,2009