Safeguarding Local Communities for REDD+ Implementation in Ghana

Author:

Andoh Jewel1ORCID,Martey Edward2ORCID,Obeng Elizabeth Asantewaa1ORCID,Oduro Kwame Antwi1,Salimath Pone3,Lee Yohan34ORCID

Affiliation:

1. CSIR-Forestry Research Institute of Ghana, Kumasi P.O. Box UP63, Ghana

2. CSIR-Savanna Agricultural Research Institute, Nyanpkala, Tamale P.O. Box TL52, Ghana

3. Department of Agriculture, Forestry, and Bioresources, Seoul National University, 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea

4. Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea

Abstract

In this study, we primarily assess the relationship between social safeguards and the living standards of local communities in different ecological zones of Ghana, relying on data from the seventh round of the Ghana Living Standard Survey (GLSS 7) and publicly available policy documents from the Ghana Statistical Service and the Forestry Commission of Ghana, respectively. This research aims to assist policymakers and stakeholders to make informed and appropriate decisions when developing social safeguards for emission reduction projects. The GLSS 7 covers 14,009 households, comprising 59,864 individuals in 892 enumeration areas or communities across the 10 regions of Ghana, now divided into 16. The data were collected using a stratified random sampling technique. Principal component analysis was employed to develop a living condition index, after which we generated a second construct based on the number of factors affecting living conditions. The results showed that access to sharecropping, literacy, extension services, financial institutions, a mobile phone network, and markets have significant positive relationships with the living conditions of local communities in Ghana. In addition, 78% of the social safeguards described in Ghana’s REDD+ strategy, Forest and Wildlife Policy, Benefits Sharing Mechanism, and Forest Plantation Development Strategy are aligned with the determinants of local communities’ living conditions. The findings suggest a need to enforce the Benefit Sharing Mechanism, better forest governance, and tenancy reforms in order to prevent the overexploitation of landowners and avoid elite capture. Furthermore, farmers must be linked to financial institutions in order to obtain credits. Additionally, we must seek to provide local communities with better access to markets and mobile phone networks in a way that allows them to carry out their livelihood activities effectively and efficiently. These measures help to reduce the risk of REDD+ actions and ensure sustainability.

Funder

Korea Forest Service

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference45 articles.

1. Hirata, Y., Takao, G., Sato, T., and Toriyama, J. (2012). REDD-Plus Cookbook, REDD Research and Development Center, Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute Japan.

2. World Bank (2023, June 15). In Ghana, Sustainable Cocoa-Forest Practices Yield Carbon Credits. Climate Stories: Ghana Carbon Credits. Available online: https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2023/06/01/in-ghana-sustainable-cocoa-forest-practices-yield-carbon-credits.

3. FCPF (2022). Ghana Cocoa Forest REDD+ Program, Scientific Certification Systems Global Services (SCS). Verification Report Version 1.3, July 2022.

4. Emerging Forest regimes and livelihoods in the Tano Offin Forest Reserve, Ghana: Implications for social safeguards;Derkyi;For. Policy Econ.,2013

5. Can REDD+ social safeguards reach the ‘right’ people? Lessons from Madagascar;Poudyal;Glob. Environ. Chang.,2016

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3