Safeguarding Local Communities for REDD+ Implementation in Ghana
Author:
Andoh Jewel1ORCID, Martey Edward2ORCID, Obeng Elizabeth Asantewaa1ORCID, Oduro Kwame Antwi1, Salimath Pone3, Lee Yohan34ORCID
Affiliation:
1. CSIR-Forestry Research Institute of Ghana, Kumasi P.O. Box UP63, Ghana 2. CSIR-Savanna Agricultural Research Institute, Nyanpkala, Tamale P.O. Box TL52, Ghana 3. Department of Agriculture, Forestry, and Bioresources, Seoul National University, 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea 4. Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea
Abstract
In this study, we primarily assess the relationship between social safeguards and the living standards of local communities in different ecological zones of Ghana, relying on data from the seventh round of the Ghana Living Standard Survey (GLSS 7) and publicly available policy documents from the Ghana Statistical Service and the Forestry Commission of Ghana, respectively. This research aims to assist policymakers and stakeholders to make informed and appropriate decisions when developing social safeguards for emission reduction projects. The GLSS 7 covers 14,009 households, comprising 59,864 individuals in 892 enumeration areas or communities across the 10 regions of Ghana, now divided into 16. The data were collected using a stratified random sampling technique. Principal component analysis was employed to develop a living condition index, after which we generated a second construct based on the number of factors affecting living conditions. The results showed that access to sharecropping, literacy, extension services, financial institutions, a mobile phone network, and markets have significant positive relationships with the living conditions of local communities in Ghana. In addition, 78% of the social safeguards described in Ghana’s REDD+ strategy, Forest and Wildlife Policy, Benefits Sharing Mechanism, and Forest Plantation Development Strategy are aligned with the determinants of local communities’ living conditions. The findings suggest a need to enforce the Benefit Sharing Mechanism, better forest governance, and tenancy reforms in order to prevent the overexploitation of landowners and avoid elite capture. Furthermore, farmers must be linked to financial institutions in order to obtain credits. Additionally, we must seek to provide local communities with better access to markets and mobile phone networks in a way that allows them to carry out their livelihood activities effectively and efficiently. These measures help to reduce the risk of REDD+ actions and ensure sustainability.
Funder
Korea Forest Service
Reference45 articles.
1. Hirata, Y., Takao, G., Sato, T., and Toriyama, J. (2012). REDD-Plus Cookbook, REDD Research and Development Center, Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute Japan. 2. World Bank (2023, June 15). In Ghana, Sustainable Cocoa-Forest Practices Yield Carbon Credits. Climate Stories: Ghana Carbon Credits. Available online: https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2023/06/01/in-ghana-sustainable-cocoa-forest-practices-yield-carbon-credits. 3. FCPF (2022). Ghana Cocoa Forest REDD+ Program, Scientific Certification Systems Global Services (SCS). Verification Report Version 1.3, July 2022. 4. Emerging Forest regimes and livelihoods in the Tano Offin Forest Reserve, Ghana: Implications for social safeguards;Derkyi;For. Policy Econ.,2013 5. Can REDD+ social safeguards reach the ‘right’ people? Lessons from Madagascar;Poudyal;Glob. Environ. Chang.,2016
|
|