Affiliation:
1. Literature, Theory, Cultural Studies Program, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
2. Philosophy and Literature Program, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
Abstract
This article considers a rarely discussed aspect, the no-cloning principle or postulate, recast as the uniqueness postulate, of the mathematical modeling known as quantum-like, Q-L, modeling (vs. classical-like, C-L, modeling, based in the mathematics adopted from classical physics) and the corresponding Q-L theories beyond physics. The principle is a transfer of the no-cloning principle (arising from the no-cloning theorem) in quantum mechanics (QM) to Q-L theories. My interest in this principle, to be related to several other key features of QM and Q-L theories, such as the irreducible role of observation, complementarity, and probabilistic causality, is connected to a more general question: What are the ontological and epistemological reasons for using Q-L models vs. C-L ones? I shall argue that adopting the uniqueness postulate is justified in Q-L theories and adds an important new motivation for doing so and a new venue for considering this question. In order to properly ground this argument, the article also offers a discussion along similar lines of QM, providing a new angle on Bohr’s concept of complementarity via the uniqueness postulate.
Subject
General Physics and Astronomy
Reference53 articles.
1. Plotnitsky, A. (2021). “Decisions and revisions which a minute will reverse”: Consciousness, the unconscious and mathematical modeling of thinking. Entropy, 23.
2. “Most tantumising state of affairs”: Mathematical and non-mathematical in quantum-like understanding of thinking;Plotnitsky;Front. Psychol.,2022
3. Plotnitsky, A. (2021). Reality without Realism: Matter, Thought, and Technology of Quantum Physics, Springer.
4. Plotnitsky, A. (2023). In our mind eye: Visible and invisible in quantum theory, with Schrödinger’s cat experiment. arXiv.
5. Scardigli, F. (2022). Artificial Intelligence Versus Natural Intelligence, Springer.