Affiliation:
1. Department of Communication, University of Zilina, 010 26 Zilina, Slovakia
2. Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Zilina, 010 26 Zilina, Slovakia
Abstract
E-Government is one area of digitization that has been under way for several years in European countries. In this paper, we focus on identifying different indices that are aimed at measuring digitalization or e-Government. The results of the analysis showed that there are several indices that focus on this area within the EU, such as EGDI, EPI, LOSI, DGI, e-Government benchmark, Eurostat—Internet use, GII, DSGI, Going Digital toolkit, and DESI. Subsequently, the index areas to be used in the DEA method to measure the efficiency of e-Government-related inputs and outputs within the EU were identified. Inputs and outputs were selected logically and then verified using correlation analysis. Among the input and output indices chosen were Internet usage, DSGI, GII, e-Government benchmark, and interaction with public administration online. From the analysis, three inputs and three outputs were used and the models were output oriented. After implementing the correlation, it can be said that the values between the selected sub-variables are suitable for DEA analysis. Two models were chosen for the calculation, namely the CCR and BCC models. The CCR model found 10 states to be efficient and BCC model found 13 states to be efficient. In addition, in the close analysis, we took a closer look at the CCR model’s inference. Countries such as Denmark, Finland, Estonia, Malta, and Portugal were efficient outliers. When comparing the regions within the EU, we can conclude that the countries of Northern Europe are the most efficient in the field of digitalization (e-Government). As many as four countries out of seven are efficient.
Subject
Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes,Computer Science Applications,Process Chemistry and Technology,General Engineering,Instrumentation,General Materials Science
Reference56 articles.
1. Digital Asset Management in the Public Sector;Fine;J. Digit. Asset Manag.,2005
2. Breaugh, J., Rackwitz, M., and Hammerschmid, G. (2023). Leadership and Institutional Design in Collaborative Government Digitalisation: Evidence from Belgium, Denmark, Estonia, Germany, and the UK. Gov. Inf. Q., 101788.
3. OECD Digital Government Index (2020). Public Governance Policy Paper, OECD.
4. United Nations (2012). United Nations E-Government Survey 2012, United Nations.
5. (2023, January 09). Digital Government Index. Available online: https://www.oecd.org/gov/digital-government-index-4de9f5bb-en.htm.
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献