A Comparison of Surface Deformation Measurement Methods for Slopes

Author:

Song Chung R.1,Wood Richard L.1ORCID,Bekele Binyam2,Glennie Nikolas3,Silvey Alex3,Nasimi Mitra1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA

2. Ardaman and Associates, Inc., Affiliated to Tetra Tech Company, Orlando, FL 32809, USA

3. Nebraska Department of Transportation, Lincoln, NE 68502, USA

Abstract

This study aimed to promote an efficient and reliable collection of deformation data for earthen slopes by comparing the Total Station (TS), Distributed Strain Sensing (DSS), and Uncrewed Aerial System (UAS)-based deformation measurement methods. The TS-based method was a two-person task with a longstanding “tried and true” reputation, and it provided acceptable results. However, it included a major portion of manual work in the field, potentially consuming extended time to obtain high-resolution data. The DSS-based method was a fiber optic cable-based one-person work, and it showed substantially faster and easier measurement. This method possessed the capability of collecting unattended measurements. The method also required anchor posts to measure deformation in segmented sections; some anchor posts became loose from shrinkage cracks and resulted in invalid measurements, particularly for soils of high plasticity. The UAS-based method was an aerial photogrammetric method. It provided an extremely high-resolution deformation profile but required a manual survey for an elevation check at reference points, although the surveying took a short amount of time by utilizing a Global Navigational Satellite Survey (GNSS) technique. This method required one operator and an assistant. From a comparison of the characteristics of the three different methods, it was found that each technique has its pros and cons, and the combination of different methods may greatly enhance the accuracy and convenience of the measurement.

Funder

Nebraska Department of Transportation

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes,Computer Science Applications,Process Chemistry and Technology,General Engineering,Instrumentation,General Materials Science

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3