Defining Terms Used for Animals Working in Support Roles for People with Support Needs
Author:
Howell Tiffani J.ORCID, Nieforth LeanneORCID, Thomas-Pino Clare, Samet LaurenORCID, Agbonika Sunday, Cuevas-Pavincich FranciscaORCID, Fry Nina Ekholm, Hill KristineORCID, Jegatheesan Brinda, Kakinuma MikiORCID, MacNamara Maureen, Mattila-Rautiainen Sanna, Perry Andy, Tardif-Williams Christine Y.ORCID, Walsh Elizabeth AnnORCID, Winkle MelissaORCID, Yamamoto Mariko, Yerbury RachelORCID, Rawat Vijay, Alm Kathy, Avci Ashley, Bailey TanyaORCID, Baker Hannah, Benton Pree, Binney Catherine, Boyle Sara, Brandes Hagit, Carr Alexa M.ORCID, Coombe Wendy, Coulter Kendra, Darby Audrey, Davies Lowri, Delisle Esther, Enders-Slegers Marie-JoseORCID, Fournier Angela, Fox Marie, Gee NancyORCID, Graham Taryn M., Hamilton-Bruce AnneORCID, Hansen Tia G. B., Hart Lynette, Heirs Morag, Hooper JadeORCID, Howe RachelORCID, Johnson ElizabethORCID, Jones Melanie, Karagiannis Christos, Kieson EmilyORCID, Kim Sun-AORCID, Kivlen Christine, Lanning BethORCID, Lewis HelenORCID, Linder DeborahORCID, Mai Dac LocORCID, Mariti ChiaraORCID, Mead RebeccaORCID, Ferreira Gilly MendesORCID, Ngai Debbie, O’Keeffe Samantha, O’Connor GrainneORCID, Olsen Christine, Ormerod Elizabeth, Power Emma R.ORCID, Pritchard Peggy A.ORCID, Rodriguez KerriORCID, Rook Deborah, Ruby Matthew B.ORCID, Schofield Leah, Signal TaniaORCID, Steel JillORCID, Stone Wendy, Symonds Melissa, Rooy Diane van, Warda Tiamat, Wilson Monica, Young JanetteORCID, Bennett PauleenORCID
Abstract
The nomenclature used to describe animals working in roles supporting people can be confusing. The same term may be used to describe different roles, or two terms may mean the same thing. This confusion is evident among researchers, practitioners, and end users. Because certain animal roles are provided with legal protections and/or government-funding support in some jurisdictions, it is necessary to clearly define the existing terms to avoid confusion. The aim of this paper is to provide operationalized definitions for nine terms, which would be useful in many world regions: “assistance animal”, “companion animal”, “educational/school support animal”, “emotional support animal”, “facility animal”, “service animal”, “skilled companion animal”, “therapy animal”, and “visiting/visitation animal”. At the International Society for Anthrozoology (ISAZ) conferences in 2018 and 2020, over 100 delegates participated in workshops to define these terms, many of whom co-authored this paper. Through an iterative process, we have defined the nine terms and explained how they differ from each other. We recommend phasing out two terms (i.e., “skilled companion animal” and “service animal”) due to overlap with other terms that could potentially exacerbate confusion. The implications for several regions of the world are discussed.
Funder
Australian Government
Subject
General Veterinary,Animal Science and Zoology
Cited by
34 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|