Farmers’ Variety Naming and Crop Varietal Diversity of Two Cereal and Three Legume Species in the Moroccan High Atlas, Using DATAR

Author:

Bernis-Fonteneau Agnès12,Aakairi Meryem3,Saadani-Hassani Omar3,Castangia Giandaniele4ORCID,Ait Babahmad Rachid3,Colangelo Paolo5ORCID,D’Ambrosio Ugo46ORCID,Jarvis Devra I.278ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Environmental Biology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy

2. Platform for Agrobiodiversity Research (PAR), The Raffaella Foundation, Twisp, WA 98856, USA

3. Moroccan Biodiversity and Livelihoods Association, Av. Sidi Abad 1, N° 280, Marrakech 40000, Morocco

4. Global Diversity Foundation (GDF), 37 St. Margaret’s Street, Canterbury CT1 2TU, UK

5. National Research Council, Institute on Terrestrial Ecosystems, Via Salaria km 29,300, Montelibretti, 00015 Rome, Italy

6. Etnobiofic Research Group, Institut Botànic de Barcelona (IBB-CSIC-ICUB), Universitat de Barcelona, Passeig del Migdia, s/n, 08038 Barcelona, Spain

7. Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA

8. Bioversity International, Via di S. Domenico 1, 00153 Roma, Italy

Abstract

Local agrobiodiversity in remote areas such as the Moroccan High Atlas is poorly studied, despite being of great importance for the sustainability and resilience of mountainous populations. This includes important species such as wheat (Triticum spp.), barley (Hordeum vulgare), fava beans (Vicia faba), peas (Pisum sativum), and alfalfa (Medicago sativa). This study aimed to better understand varietal naming by farmers and the traits they use for assessing the current diversity of the five species, in 22 locations, distributed across three hubs of the High Atlas. The data were provided by 282 Amazigh informants during focus-group discussions, household surveys, and market surveys, with the support of the Diversity Assessment Tool for Agrobiodiversity and Resilience (DATAR). The use of local terminology for variety names and systematically collected morphological, ecological, and use descriptors appears to be a valuable way to assess local intraspecific diversity, and further comparisons with genomic results are recommended. Furthermore, the results also indicate low diversity at the household level, which contrasts with the greater diversity at the community level. Larger areas are still planted with landraces compared to areas planted with modern varieties, although the levels of richness (number) of both landraces and modern varieties are equivalent overall. Many factors influence this diversity: the biophysical characteristics of the sites, the socio-economic and management practices of farmers, and the availability of varietal diversity and of modern varieties or landraces. Although selection processes have reduced the local diversity available for economically important crops, we found that farmers still rely greatly on landraces, which present traits and variability that allow them to adapt to local conditions.

Funder

DEFRA—UK Darwin Initiative

Raffaella Foundation

Global Environmental Facility (GEF)—International Fund for Agricultural Development

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development,Building and Construction

Reference138 articles.

1. A risk-minimizing argument for traditional crop varietal diversity use to reduce pest and disease damage in agricultural ecosystems of Uganda;Mulumba;Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.,2012

2. An Heuristic Framework for Identifying Multiple Ways of Supporting the Conservation and Use of Traditional Crop Varieties within the Agricultural Production System;Jarvis;Crit. Rev. Plant Sci.,2011

3. Components of the ecosystem as instruments of cultural practices in the in situ conservation of agricultural biodiversity;Sawadogo;Plant Genet. Resour. Newsl.,2005

4. Bhandari, B. (2009). Summer Rainfall Variability and the Use of Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Varietal Diversity for Adaptation: Farmers’ Perceptions and Responses in Nepal. [Master’s Thesis, CBM Swedish Biodiversity Centre].

5. Wood, D., and Lenn´e, J.M. (1999). Agrobiodiversity. Characterization, Utilization and Management, CABI Publishing.

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3