Abstract
Wind and/or earthquake-imposed loadings on two dynamically similar adjacent buildings cause vigorous shaking that can be mitigated using energy dissipating devices. Here, the vibration response control in such adjacent structures interconnected with semi-active magneto-rheological (MR) dampers is studied, which could also be used as a retrofitting measure in existing structures apart from employing them in new constructions. The semi-active nature of the MR damper is modeled using the popular Lyapunov control algorithm owing to its least computational efforts among the other considered control algorithms. The semi-active performance of the MR damper is compared with its two passive states, e.g., passive-off and passive-on, in which voltage applied to the damper is kept constant throughout the occurrence of a hazard, to establish its effectiveness even during the probable electric power failure during the wind or seismic hazards. The performance of the MR damper, in terms of structural response reduction, is compared with other popular energy dissipating devices, such as viscous and friction dampers. Four damper arrangements have been considered to arrive at the most effective configuration for interconnecting the two adjoining structures. Structural responses are recorded in terms of storey displacement, storey acceleration, and storey shear forces. Coupling the two adjacent dynamically similar buildings results in over a 50% reduction in the structural vibration against both wind and earthquake hazards, and this is achieved by not necessarily connecting all the floors of the structures with dampers. The comparative analysis indicates that the semi-active MR damper is more effective for response control than the other passive dampers.
Subject
Computer Science Applications,Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology,General Materials Science,Building and Construction,Civil and Structural Engineering
Reference60 articles.
1. Effectiveness of passive response control devices in buildings under earthquake and wind during design life;Roy;Struct. Infrastruct. Eng.,2019
2. Structural control: Past, present, and future;Housner;J. Eng. Mech.,1997
3. Farzam, M.F., Jalali, H.H., Gavgani SA, M., Kayabekir, A.E., and Bekdaş, G. (2021). Current Trends in the Optimization Approaches for Optimal Structural Control in: Advances in Structural Engineering, Springer International Publishing AG.
4. Klein, R.E., Cusano, C., and Stukel, J. (1972, January 26–30). Investigation of a method to stabilize wind induced oscillations in large structures. Proceedings of the ASME Winter Annual Meeting, New York, NY, USA. Paper No. 72-WA/AUT-H.
5. The dynamics of interstructural connection to prevent pounding;Westermo;Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn.,1989
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献