Selective State DOT Lane Width Standards and Guidelines to Reduce Speeds and Improve Safety

Author:

Ewing Reid1,Yang Wookjae2,Promy Noshin Siara13,Kaniewska Justyna1,Tabassum Nawshin1

Affiliation:

1. Department of City and Metropolitan Planning, College of Architecture + Planning, University of Utah, 375S 1530E, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA

2. Urban Policy and Administration, Incheon National University, 119 Academy-ro, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon 22012, Republic of Korea

3. STV Inc., 1600 Perimeter Park Dr., Suite 225, Morrisville, NC 27560, USA

Abstract

This research investigates the lane width standards and guidelines implemented by various State Departments of Transportation (DOTs) to reduce vehicle speeds and enhance road safety. Lane width reduction is often perceived as a strategy to mitigate speed and improve safety. Still, its effectiveness and implications vary across different contexts, including regions, urban/rural settings, or other geometric design features. Drawing from interviews with five State DOTs and a review of their road design manuals, this study aims to identify suggested lane widths depending on the contexts, design exception process when narrowing or widening lane widths, and introduce representative before/after studies. The findings indicate that State DOTs tend to have lower recommended lane widths in urban areas than in rural areas. Moreover, lane width standards among these states vary due to several factors, including the geographical location of roadways (urban or rural areas), design or posted speeds, traffic volume, road classification, and geometric road design features. Design exceptions are required if the existing or proposed design element is incompatible with both AASHTO and department governing criteria. In conclusion, the findings will provide valuable insights and recommendations for policymakers, transportation planners, and road engineers to inform optimal lane width and decision-making processes.

Funder

Utah Department of Transportation

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference18 articles.

1. Swift, P., Painter, D., and Goldstein, M. (1997). Residential Street Typology and Injury Accident Frequency, Congress for the New Urbanism.

2. Safety Models for Urban Four-Lane Undivided Road Segments;Hauer;Transp. Res. Rec.,2004

3. Relationship of Lane Width to Safety on Urban and Suburban Arterials;Potts;Transp. Res. Rec.,2007

4. Strathman, J.G., Dueker, K.J., Zhang, J., and Williams, T. (2023, November 14). Analysis of Design Attributes and Crashes on the Oregon Highway System, Available online: https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/22811.

5. Exploring a Bayesian Hierarchical Approach for Developing Safety Performance Functions for a Mountainous Freeway;Ahmed;Accid. Anal. Prev.,2011

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3