Modified Asphalt with Graphene-Enhanced Polymeric Compound: A Case Study

Author:

Bruno Salvatore1ORCID,Carpani Carlo2,Loprencipe Giuseppe1ORCID,Venturini Loretta2,Vita Lorenzo1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Civil, Constructional and Environmental Engineering, Sapienza University of Rome, Via Eudossiana 18, 00184 Rome, Italy

2. Iterchimica S.p.A., Via G. Marconi, 21, 24040 Suisio, Italy

Abstract

In recent years, the increased use of heavy commercial vehicles with higher axle weights has required the development of innovative technologies to improve the mechanical properties of asphalt concrete conglomerates, such as fatigue resistance and rutting. This study offers a comprehensive comparative analysis of different types of asphalt concrete tested in four trial sections (S1, S2, S3, S4) of the SP3 Ardeatina rural road in Rome, under actual traffic and operational conditions. More precisely, the pavement technologies applied include modified asphalt concrete with graphene and recycled hard plastics for S1, asphalt concrete modified with styrene–butadiene–styrene (SBS) for S2, asphalt concrete with a standard polymeric compound for S3, and traditional asphalt concrete for S4. The evaluation approach involved visual inspections in order to calculate the pavement condition index (PCI) and falling weight deflectometer (FWD) tests. In addition, back-calculation analyses were performed using ELMOD software to assess the mechanical properties. The laboratory tests revealed superior properties of M1 in terms of its resistance to permanent deformations (+13%, +15%, and +19.5% compared to M2, M3, and M4, respectively) and stiffness (10,758 MPa for M1 vs. 9259 MPa, 7643 MPa, and 7289 MPa for M2, M3, and M4, respectively). These findings were further corroborated by the PCI values (PCIS1 = 65; PCIS2 = 17; PCIS3 = 28; PCIS4 = 29) as well as the FWD test results after 5 years of investigation, which suggests greater durability and resistance than the other sections.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference82 articles.

1. A Comparative Study on Rigid and Flexible Pavement: A Review;Mohod;IOSR J. Mech. Civ. Eng. IOSR-JMCE,2016

2. Ventura, R. (2023). Bridge’s Vehicular Loads Characterization through Weight-In-Motion (WIM) Systems. The Case Study of Brescia. Eur. Transp., 1–12.

3. Monitoring Vehicles with Permits and That Are Illegally Overweight on Bridges Using Weigh-In-Motion (WIM) Devices: A Case Study from Brescia;Ventura;Case Stud. Transp. Policy,2023

4. Review on Evolution and Evaluation of Asphalt Pavement Structures and Materials;Liu;J. Traffic Transp. Eng. (Engl. Ed.),2020

5. Effect of Vehicle Speed and Overload on Dynamic Response of Semi-Rigid Base Asphalt Pavement;Assogba;Road Mater. Pavement Des.,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3