Analysis of Road Users’ Risk Behaviors in Different Travel Modes: The Bangkok Metropolitan Region, Thailand

Author:

Iamtrakul Pawinee1ORCID,Chayphong Sararad1,Makó Emese2ORCID,Phetoudom Souvathone2

Affiliation:

1. Center of Excellence in Urban Mobility Research and Innovation, Faculty of Architecture and Planning, Thammasat University, Pathumthani 12120, Thailand

2. Department of Transport Infrastructure and Water Resources Engineering, Széchenyi István University, 9026 Győr, Hungary

Abstract

This study explores road users’ behaviors and accident analyses on different travel modes in the Bangkok Metropolitan Region (BMR). The questionnaire survey was adopted and designed based on contributing factors related to risk behavior perceptions in different travel modes. A total of 3000 participants submitted questionnaires that provided data for a multiple regression model analysis. The results indicated that different travel modes have different risk behavior perceptions. Road users of vulnerable modes of travel, such as walking and cycling, were more aware of risky behaviors than users of others. Risky, violent behavior may occur due to fatigue, driving while taking drugs, or aggressive tactics where the driver may lose control and cause an accident. However, driver negligence, especially violating traffic rules, may sometimes cause risky behavior. The results show that age, gender, education level, income level, marital status, driving experience, accident experience, and attitude toward road safety affect risk behavior perception. In conclusion, the differentiation of vehicles plays a vital role as a critical issue that should be understood for effectively mitigating risks in different travel patterns.

Funder

Thailand Science Research and Innovation (TSRI) with Fundamental Fund

Thammasat University Research Fund with Fast Track

Széchenyi István University

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Computer Science Applications,Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology,General Materials Science,Building and Construction,Civil and Structural Engineering

Reference64 articles.

1. Eid, M., and Larsen, R. (2008). The Science of Subjective Wellbeing, The Guilford Press.

2. Santacreu, A. (2018). International Transport Forum Working Document, OECD Publishing.

3. IRTAD (2014). Road Safety Annual Report 2014, International Traffic Safety Data and Analysis Group.

4. A few seconds to have an accident, a long time to recover: Consequences for road accident victims from the ESPARR cohort 2 years after the accident;Tournier;Accid. Anal. Prev.,2014

5. The relationship between religiosity and subjective well-being: A case of Kuwaiti car accident victims;Ashkanani;Traumatology,2009

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3