Battery Electric Buses or Fuel Cell Electric Buses? A Decarbonization Case Study in the City of Brescia, Italy
-
Published:2023-12-11
Issue:12
Volume:8
Page:178
-
ISSN:2412-3811
-
Container-title:Infrastructures
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Infrastructures
Author:
Borghetti Fabio1ORCID, Longo Michela2ORCID, Bonera Michela3, Libretti Marco3, Somaschini Claudio4ORCID, Martinelli Valentina3, Medeghini Marco3, Mazzoncini Renato5
Affiliation:
1. Mobility and Transport Laboratory, Design Department, Politecnico di Milano, Via Candiani 72, 20158 Milano, Italy 2. Department of Energy, Politecnico di Milano, Via la Masa 34, 20156 Milano, Italy 3. Brescia Mobilità S.p.A., Via Magnolini 3, 25135 Brescia, Italy 4. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Via la Masa 1, 20156 Milano, Italy 5. A2A S.p.A., Corso di Porta Vittoria 4, 20122 Milano, Italy
Abstract
Nowadays, designing and adopting sustainable and greener transport systems is of upmost interest. The European Commission and different EU countries are developing plans and programs—but also delivering resources—aimed at the decarbonization of cities and transport by 2030. In this paper, the case study of the city of Brescia, a city of about 200,000 inhabitants located in northern Italy, is addressed. Specifically, a preliminary operational and financial feasibility study is performed assuming the replacement of the entire compressed natural gas (CNG) powered bus fleet of a specific line; the two alternatives considered are battery electric buses (BEBs) and fuel cell electric buses (FCEBs). For the comparison and evaluation of the two alternatives, specific economic parameters of the three alternatives (BEB, FCEB and the current solution CNGB) were considered: CAPEX (CAPital EXpenditure) and OPEX (OPerational EXpenditure). This allowed us to determine the TCO (total cost of ownership) and TCRO (total cost and revenues of ownership) along three annuities (2022, 2025 and 2030). For the BEB alternative, the TCO and TCRO values are between EUR 0.58/km and EUR 0.91/km. In the case of the FCEB solution, the values of TCO and TCRO are between EUR 1.75/km and EUR 2.15/km. Considering the current CNGB solution, the TCO and TCRO values range between EUR 1.43/km and EUR 1.51/km.
Subject
Computer Science Applications,Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology,General Materials Science,Building and Construction,Civil and Structural Engineering
Reference37 articles.
1. EEA (European Environment Agency) (2023, October 08). Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Transport in Europe. Available online: https://www.eea.europa.eu/ims/greenhouse-gas-emissions-from-transport. 2. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2019). World UrbanizationProspects: The 2018 Revision (ST/ESA/SER.A/420), United Nations. Available online: https://www.un.org/en/desa/2018-revision-world-urbanization-prospects. 3. European Commission, Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport (2023, October 08). Sustainable Urban Mobility: European Policy, Practice and Solutions, Publications Office. Available online: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/17e00da9-da39-11e7-a506-01aa75ed71a1/language-en. 4. Ranieri, L., Digiesi, S., Silvestri, B., and Roccotelli, M. (2018). A review of last mile logistics innovations in an externalities cost reduction vision. Sustainability, 10. 5. Essen, H., Fiorello, D., El Beyrouty, K., and Directorate—General for Mobility and Transport (2020). Handbook on the External Costs of Transport: Version 2019-1.1, Publications Office, European Commission. Available online: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/9781f65f-8448-11ea-bf12-01aa75ed71a1.
|
|