Affiliation:
1. Department of Ecology, Montana State University, P.O. Box 173460, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA
2. Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E9, Canada
Abstract
Inbreeding depression can reduce the viability of wild populations. Detecting inbreeding depression in the wild is difficult; developing accurate estimates of inbreeding can be time and labor intensive. In this study, we used a two-step modeling procedure to incorporate uncertainty inherent in estimating individual inbreeding coefficients from multilocus genotypes into estimates of inbreeding depression in a population of Weddell seals (Leptonychotes weddellii). The two-step modeling procedure presented in this paper provides a method for estimating the magnitude of a known source of error, which is assumed absent in classic regression models, and incorporating this error into inferences about inbreeding depression. The method is essentially an errors-in-variables regression with non-normal errors in both the dependent and independent variables. These models, therefore, allow for a better evaluation of the uncertainty surrounding the biological importance of inbreeding depression in non-pedigreed wild populations. For this study we genotyped 154 adult female seals from the population in Erebus Bay, Antarctica, at 29 microsatellite loci, 12 of which are novel. We used a statistical evidence approach to inference rather than hypothesis testing because the discovery of both low and high levels of inbreeding are of scientific interest. We found evidence for an absence of inbreeding depression in lifetime reproductive success, adult survival, age at maturity, and the reproductive interval of female seals in this population.
Funder
National Science Foundation
prior NSF Grants
Subject
General Physics and Astronomy
Reference90 articles.
1. Popper, K. (1959). The Logic of Scientific Discovery, Routledge.
2. Errors in statistical inference under model misspecification: Evidence, hypothesis testing, and AIC;Dennis;Front. Ecol. Evol.,2019
3. Publication decisions and their possible effects on inferences drawn from tests of significance—Or vice versa;Sterling;J. Am. Statl. Assoc.,1959
4. The “file drawer problem” and tolerance for null results;Rosenthal;Psychol. Bull.,1979
5. Editorial: Evidential statistics, model identification, and science;Taper;Front. Ecol. Evol.,2022