Analysis of Velocity, Power and Skin Temperature in Paralympic Powerlifting Athletes with Fixed and Variable Resistance

Author:

Filho Gildo Francisco dos Santos12,Aidar Felipe J.123ORCID,Getirana-Mota Márcio123ORCID,Brito Ciro José4ORCID,Aedo-Muñoz Esteban5ORCID,de Almeida Paz Ângelo123,de Souza Leite Júnior Joilson Alves123ORCID,Vieira Edson Lucas Monteiro12ORCID,Nikolaidis Pantelis T.6ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Graduate Program of Physical Education, Federal University of Sergipe, São Cristóvão 49100-000, Brazil

2. Group of Studies and Research of Performance, Sport, Health and Paralympic Sports—GPEPS, The Federal University of Sergipe, São Cristóvão 49100-000, Brazil

3. Graduate Program of Physiological Science, Federal University of Sergipe, São Cristóvão 49100-000, Brazil

4. Department of Physical Education, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Governador Valadares 35010-180, Brazil

5. Departamento de Educación Física, Deportes y Recreación, Universidad Metropolitana de Ciencias de la Educación, Santiago 7760197, Chile

6. School of Health and Caring Sciences, University of West Attica, Egaleo, 12243 Athens, Greece

Abstract

Variable resistance training has been widely used in athletic preparation. Objectives: To analyze the use of currents (VRT) and the traditional method (TRAD) on speed, power and temperature in a training session. Methods: Fourteen paralympic powerlifting (PP) athletes took part over three weeks. In week 1, familiarization and 1RM tests took place, and, in weeks 2 and 3, pre- and post-training took place, where the propulsive mean velocity and power and temperatures were assessed before and after, at 24 h and 48 h. Results: There was a difference in the sternal pectoral temperatures before and after VRT (p = 0.040) and at 48 h for TRAD and VRT (p = 0.018); in the clavicular pectoralis before and after VRT and TRAD (p = 0.003); in the anterior deltoid after and at 48 h for TRAD and VRT (p = 0.026 and p = 0.017); and in the triceps after and at 24 h and 48 h between TRAD and VRT (p = 0.005). In the training series, the MPV was significant in TRAD between Set1 and Set5 (p = 0.003), in training (VRT) between Set1 and Set5 (p = 0.001) and in Set5 between the methods (p = 0.047). For power, there was a difference between Set1 and 5 in TRAD (p = 0.016) and VRT (p = 0.002). Conclusion: We conclude that training with currents (VRT) promoted greater muscle fatigue when compared to traditional training.

Funder

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Brasil

Publisher

MDPI AG

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3