“Are You a Boy or a Girl?”—A Missing Response Analysis

Author:

Heinz Andreas1ORCID,Költő András2ORCID,Taylor Ashley B.3ORCID,Chan Ace3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Health, IU International University of Applied Sciences, Juri-Gagarin Ring 152, 99084 Erfurt, Germany

2. Health Promotion Research Centre, National University of Ireland, University Rd., H91 TK33 Galway, Ireland

3. Stigma and Resilience Among Vulnerable Youth Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada

Abstract

Many adolescent health surveys ask if respondents are male or female. Non-response may be due to fear of de-anonymisation or being a gender-nonconforming youth. The present study investigates the frequency of non-response and its potential reasons. To this end, data from 54,833 adolescents aged 11–18 from six countries, participating in the 2018 Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study, were analysed. Respondents were divided into three groups: (1) “Responders” who answered both questions on age and gender, (2) “Age non-responders” who did not answer the question on age, and (3) “Gender non-responders” who answered the question on age but not the one on gender. These groups were compared regarding their non-response to other questions and regarding their health. Overall, 98.0% were responders, 1.6% were age non-responders and 0.4% were gender non-responders. On average, age non-responders skipped more questions (4.2 out or 64) than gender non-responders (3.2) and responders (2.1). Gender non-responders reported more psychosomatic complaints, more frequent substance use and lower family support than responders. This study shows that age and gender non-responders differ in their response styles, suggesting different reasons for skipping the gender question. The health disparities found between the groups suggest that further research should use a more nuanced approach, informed by LGBT+ youth’s insights, to measure sex assigned at birth and gender identity.

Funder

Canadian Institutes for Health Research

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Reference43 articles.

1. Inchley, J., Currie, D., Cosma, A., and Samdal, O. (2023, September 06). Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) Study Protocol: Background, Methodology and Mandatory Items for the 2017/18 Survey, St Andrews. Available online: https://hbsc.org/publications/survey-protocols/.

2. Riphahn, R.T., and Serfling, O. (2002). Item Non-Response on Income and Wealth Questions, Institute for the Study of Labor. Available online: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/21355/1/dp573.pdf.

3. Hippler, H.-J., Schwarz, N., and Sudman, S. (1987). Social Information Processing and Survey Methodology, Springer.

4. Tourangeau, R., Rips, L.J., and Rasinski, K.A. (2000). The Psychology of Survey Response, Cambridge University Press.

5. Cognitive aspects of survey methodology;Schwarz;Appl. Cogn. Psychol.,2007

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3