Investigating Facilitators and Barriers for Active Breaks among Secondary School Students: Formative Evaluation of Teachers and Students

Author:

Masini Alice1ORCID,Longo Giulia2ORCID,Ricci Matteo2ORCID,Scheier Lawrence M.34ORCID,Sansavini Alessandra5ORCID,Ceciliani Andrea6,Dallolio Laura2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont, 28100 Novara, Italy

2. Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Section of Hygiene and Preventive Medicine, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy

3. LARS Research Institute, Inc., Sun City, AZ 85351, USA

4. Prevention Strategies, Greensboro, NC 27410, USA

5. Department of Psychology “Renzo Canestrari”, University of Bologna, 40127 Bologna, Italy

6. Department of Life Quality Studies, University of Bologna, Campus of Rimini, 47921 Rimini, Italy

Abstract

Physical activity in the form of “active breaks” can be combined with academic instruction in primary school. However, few studies have examined the feasibility of conducting active breaks in secondary school. To address this gap, we conducted focus groups (FGs) regarding the implementation of an active breaks (ABs) protocol with 20 teachers and 10 secondary school students. Barriers/facilitators toward the implementation of ABs were classified using grounded theory inductive methods framed by the socio-ecological model. Individual-level factors were instrumental for both teachers and students. Teachers highlighted personal fears and concerns regarding using ABs, while students reported fears related to peer behaviour during the activity. Both teachers and students agreed that ABs can improve cognitive skills and time-on-task behaviour. Teachers articulated concerns related to student behaviour during ABs including possible social exclusion and injury. Students felt that ABs might affect classroom management and interfere with maintaining students’ academic focus. Teachers underscored that ABs required social support from the administration and colleagues. Students felt that ABs could support teachers’ instructional focus and provide them with an energy respite. Collectively, the FGs suggested that environmental limitations could hinder the implementation of ABs. Involving teacher and student feedback during the codesign phase can rationally inform the design of school-based ABs.

Publisher

MDPI AG

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3