Comparison of Three Different Multiple Organ Dysfunction Scores for Predicting Mortality after Neonatal Cardiac Surgery

Author:

Bezirganoglu Handan1,Okur Nilufer2,Ozdemir Fatih3ORCID,Gul Ozlem4ORCID,Aldudak Bedri4

Affiliation:

1. Division of Neonatology, Trabzon Kanuni Training and Research Hospital, Trabzon 61250, Türkiye

2. Division of Neonatology, Diyarbakir Gazi Yasargil Training and Research Hospital, Diyarbakir 21010, Türkiye

3. Department of Pediatric Cardiovascular Surgery, Dr. Siyami Ersek Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul 34668, Türkiye

4. Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Diyarbakir Gazi Yasargil Training and Research Hospital, Diyarbakir 21010, Türkiye

Abstract

Infants who undergo cardiac surgery frequently have complications that may advance to multiple organ failure and result in mortality. This study aims to compare three different multiple organ dysfunction scoring systems: the Neonatal Multiple Organ Dysfunction (NEOMOD) score, the modified NEOMOD score, and the Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction-2 (PELOD-2) score in predicting postoperative 30-day mortality in neonates undergoing cardiac surgery. This retrospective cohort study was conducted between January 2019 and February 2021 in a single unit on neonates operated on due to congenital heart disease in the first 28 days of life. Patients who underwent off-pump surgeries were excluded from the study. The NEOMOD, modified NEOMOD, and PELOD-2 scores were calculated for each of the first 3 days following surgery. A total of 138 patients were included. All scores had satisfactory goodness-of-fit and at least good discriminative ability on each day. The modified NEOMOD score consistently demonstrated the best prediction among these three scores after the first day, reaching its peak performance on day 2 (area under curve: 0.824, CI: 0.75–0.89). Our findings suggest that NEOMOD and modified NEOMOD scores in the first 72 h could potentially serve as a predictor of mortality in this population.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3