Disparities in Neonatal Mortalities in the United States

Author:

Qattea Ibrahim12ORCID,Burdjalov Maria3ORCID,Quatei Amani1,Agha Khalil Tamr4,Kteish Rayan2,Aly Hany1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neonatalogy, Cleveland Clinic Children’s, 9500 Euclid Avenue #M31-37, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA

2. Department of Pediatrics, Nassau University Medical Center, New York, NY 11554, USA

3. College of Arts and Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA

4. Department of Pediatrics, Upstate Golisano Children Hospital, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to look for the mortality of Black and White Neonates and compare the Black and White neonates’ mortalities after stratifying the population by many significant epidemiologic and hospital factors. Design/Method: We utilized the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) dataset over seven years from 2012 through 2018 for all neonates ≤ 28 days of age in all hospitals in the USA. Neonatal characteristics used in the analysis included ethnicity, sex, household income, and type of healthcare insurance. Hospital characteristics were urban teaching, urban non-teaching, and rural. Hospital location was classified according to the nine U.S. Census Division regions. Results: Neonatal mortality continues to be higher in Black populations: 21,975 (0.63%) than in White populations: 35,495 (0.28%). Government-supported health insurance was significantly more among Black populations when compared to White (68.8% vs. 35.3% p < 0.001). Household income differed significantly; almost half (49.8%) of the Black population has income ≤ 25th percentile vs. 22.1% in White. There was a significant variation in mortality in different U.S. locations. In the Black population, the highest mortality was in the West North Central division (0.72%), and the lower mortality was in the New England division (0.51%), whereas in the White population, the highest mortality was in the East South-Central division (0.36%), and the lowest mortality was in the New England division (0.21%). Trend analysis showed a significant decrease in mortality in Black and White populations over the years, but when stratifying the population by sex, type of insurance, household income, and type of hospital, the mortality was consistently higher in Black groups throughout the study years. Conclusions: Disparities in neonatal mortality continue to be higher in Black populations; there was a significant variation in mortality in different U.S. locations. In the Black population, the highest mortality was in the West North Central division, and the lower mortality was in the New England division, whereas in the White population, the highest mortality was in the East South Central division, and the lowest mortality was in the New England division. There has been a significant decrease in mortality in Black and White populations over the years, but when stratifying the population by many significant epidemiologic and hospital factors, the mortality was consistently higher in Black groups throughout the study years.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Reference17 articles.

1. Racial and ethnic disparities in infant mortality in the United States: The role of gestational age;Chen;Am. J. Perinatol.,2013

2. Variations in neonatal mortality, infant mortality, preterm birth and birth weight in England and Wales according to ethnicity and maternal country or region of birth: An analysis of linked national data from 2006 to 2012;Opondo;J. Epidemiol. Community Health,2020

3. Racial disparity in infant mortality;Matoba;Semin. Perinatol.,2017

4. (2022, January 28). Infant Mortality|Maternal and Infant Health|Reproductive Health|CDC, Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/maternalinfanthealth/infantmortality.htm.

5. birth weight/gestational age-specific neonatal mortality: 1995-1997 rates for whites, hispanics, and blacks;Alexander;Pediatrics,2003

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3