Daily Optional Physical Education Does Not Counteract Increasing Inactivity by Age among Adolescents
Author:
Lábiscsák-Erdélyi Zsuzsa1, Somhegyi Annamária2, Veres-Balajti Ilona1, Kósa Karolina3ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Debrecen, 4028 Debrecen, Hungary 2. Schools for Health in Europe Network Foundation, National Center for Spinal Disorders, 1126 Budapest, Hungary 3. Department of Behavioral Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary
Abstract
Background: This paper describes the outcomes of an integrated health promotion programme implemented in a Hungarian high school offering health education in the curriculum, daily optional physical education, teacher training in applying a person-centered approach in teaching, and parental involvement in school activities. Methods: The evaluation used mixed methods of which results of the before-6-months-after quantitative survey among pupils is described. The health status and behaviour of students were assessed by applying the Hungarian version of the HBSC questionnaire. Results: Significant improvement was found in the self-rated health of girls (6.6% increase in being of excellent health, p = 0.04), and the consumption of sweets and sugary soft drinks decreased significantly for both genders (boys: −10.2%, p = 0.01; girls: −6.06%, p = 0.04). However, the proportion of physically inactive girls significantly increased (girls: 11.2%, p = 0.01), and substance use did not change significantly. Discussion and conclusions: The intervention had significant positive impacts on subjective health and dietary habits and could counteract the secular trend of increasing tobacco, alcohol, and drug consumption by age among adolescents, but this unfortunately does not include physical inactivity. Offsetting the most widespread health risk behavior, physical inactivity, may require mandatory daily physical education in schools.
Funder
European Union under the European Social Fund and European Regional Development Fund
Subject
Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
Reference31 articles.
1. World Health Organization (2022, July 07). Global School Health Initiative, Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/330492/WH-1996-Jul-Aug-p5-6-eng.pdf. 2. Burgher, M., Barnekow, V., Rasmussen, V., and Rivett, D. (2022, July 07). The European Network of Health Promoting Schools (ENHPS). Available online: https://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/252391/E62361.pdf. 3. McQueen, D.V., and Jones, C.M. (2007). Global Perspectives on Health Promotion Effectiveness, Springer. 4. Rootman, I., Goodstadt, M., Potvin, L., and Springett, J. (2001). A framework for health promotion evaluation. WHO Reg. Publ. Eur. Ser., 7–38. 5. Reconsidering community-based health promotion: Promise, performance, and potential;Merzel;Am. J. Public Health,2003
|
|