Meticulous and Early Understanding of Congenital Cranial Defects Can Save Lives

Author:

Al Kaissi Ali1ORCID,Ryabykh Sergey1,Chehida Farid Ben2,Al Kaissi Hamza3,Kircher Susanne Gerit4,Grill Franz5,Guben Alexander6

Affiliation:

1. National Medical Research Center for Traumatology and Orthopedics n.a. G.A. Ilizarov, 640014 Kurgan, Russia

2. Ibn Zohr Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, Cite Al Khadra, Tunis 1003, Tunisia

3. Clinic for Dermatology and Allergology, Luisen Hospital, 52064 Aachen, Germany

4. Center of Medical Patho-Biochemistry and Genetics, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria

5. Pediatric Department, Orthopedic Hospital of Speising, 1130 Vienna, Austria

6. Department of Orthopedic Department, Saint-Petersburg State University Hospital, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia

Abstract

Background: Omitting the early closure of the cranial sutures in newly born children is not an uncommon practice. We describe the natural history of several unrelated children and adults from two unrelated families. These children were born with variable clinical manifestations: craniofacial asymmetry, ocular proptosis, floppiness, and progressive deceleration in cognitive development. None of these children underwent a cranial sutures assessment. False diagnoses of positional plagiocephaly, neonatal thyrotoxicosis, congenital muscular atrophy, and hydrocephalus were given to the parents. This sort of malpractice was the reason behind a sequence of devastating pathological events that occurred in the lifetime of these children and adults. Material and Methods: This was a multigenerational study of two unrelated families. In total, we studied three children (aged 7–19 years) and three adults (aged 40–52 years) from two families. The children from the first family were referred to our departments because of pre-pubertal scoliosis, kyphoscoliosis, and early-onset osteoarthritis. Reading the clinical histories of these children signified apparent clinical misconceptions. For instance, craniofacial asymmetry was misinterpreted as positional plagiocephaly and treated by means of helmet molding therapy. Ocular proptosis was given the false diagnosis of neonatal thyrotoxicosis. Floppiness (hypotonia) was misdiagnosed as congenital muscular dystrophy. The index case from the second family showed progressive deceleration in his cognitive development, associated with signs of increased intracranial pressure. The only diagnosis was Dandy–Walker malformation. We documented every patient in accordance with the clinical and radiological phenotypic characterizations. The genotype characterization followed accordingly. Results: All patients in family (I) manifested a phenotype consistent to a certain extent with the clinical phenotype of Shprintzen–Goldberg syndrome (SGS), though the intensity of spine deformities was greater than has been described in the literature. The second family showed a constellation of Marfanoid habitus, craniosynostosis, increased intracranial pressure, hydrocephalus, Dandy–Walker malformation, seizures, and intellectual disability. The overall clinical phenotype was consistent but not fully diagnostic of craniosynostosis–Dandy–Walker-malformation hydrocephalus syndrome. The early closure of the sutures was totally different from one patient to another, including the premature closure of the metopic, coronal, squamosal, and sagittal sutures. One patient from family (II) underwent the implementation of a shunt system at the age of 3 years, unfortunately passing over the pre-existing craniosynostosis. In addition to skeletal deformities, a history of seizures and severe intellectual disability was recorded. The proband underwent chromosomal karyotyping, the FISH test, and whole-exome sequencing. Conclusion: The purpose of this study was fivefold. Firstly, to gain a meticulous understanding in order to differentiate between positional plagiocephaly, hypotonia, and congenital exophthalmos and their connections to abnormal craniofacial contours was and still is our first and foremost concern. Secondly, we aimed to characterize craniosynostosis, seizures, intellectual disabilities, and hydrocephalus associated with Marfanoid habitus, which were clearly demonstrated in our patients. Thirdly, we aimed to address the imperative for interpretations of clinical and radiological phenotypes and relate these tools to etiological understanding, which is an essential basis for diagnosis in the majority of long-term pediatric admissions. Fourthly, we aimed to assess the impacts of the missed early closure by the pediatricians and pediatric neurologists, which added a heavy pathological burden on these patients and their families. Fifthly, we aimed to identify whether early and diligent recognition can assist in cranial vault remodeling via surgical intervention to halt premature cranial suture fusions and can possibly alter the devastating course and the complications of the synostosed sutures.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Reference29 articles.

1. Syndromic Craniosynostosis;Wang;Facial Plast. Surg. Clin. N. Am.,2016

2. Genetics of craniofacial development;Hoogeboom;Ned. Tijdschr. Tandheelkd.,2008

3. Growth of the normal skull vault and its alteration in craniosynostosis: Insights from human genetics and experimental studies;Wilkie;J. Anat.,2005

4. Cranial sutures as intramembranous bone growth sites;Opperman;Dev. Dyn.,2000

5. A recurrent pattern syndrome of craniosynostosis associated with arachnodactyly and abdominal hernias;Shprintzen;J. Craniofacial Gen. Dev. Bio,1982

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3