The Effects of Dexmedetomidine on Children Undergoing Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Author:

Angelopoulou Valentina-Anastasia12ORCID,Pouliakis Abraham3ORCID,Alexiou Nikolaos4,Ioannidi Parthena56,Vagiona Dimitra7ORCID,Ekmektzoglou Konstantinos28ORCID,Xanthos Theodoros9ORCID,Boutsikou Theodora10,Iliodromiti Zoi10ORCID,Iacovidou Nikoletta210ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Radiology, General Hospital of Elefsina “Thriasio”, 19600 Attica, Greece

2. Postgraduate Study Program (MSc) “Resuscitation”, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece

3. Second Department of Pathology, “Attikon” University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12464 Athens, Greece

4. First Department of Internal Medicine, General Hospital of Elefsina “Thriasio”, 19600 Attica, Greece

5. Department of Invasive Radiology, General Hospital of Athens “Evangelismos”, 10676 Athens, Greece

6. European Board of Interventional Radiology (EBIR), 1010 Vienna, Austria

7. Primary Health Center of Nevrokopi, General Hospital of Drama, 66100 Drama, Greece

8. School of Medicine, European University Cyprus, 2404 Nicosia, Cyprus

9. School of Health Sciences, University of West Attica, 12243 Athens, Greece

10. Department of Neonatology, “Aretaieio” Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece

Abstract

Background: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is a valuable diagnostic tool but often requires sedation to complete, especially in children. Dexmedetomidine (DEX) is an a2 agonist, for which there are experimental findings that support its potential neuroprotective effects. Given the potential risks of anesthetic drugs, we ran this study to examine DEX’s effectiveness and cardiopulmonary safety as a sedative drug for children undergoing MRI. Material and Methods: Systematic research was conducted in PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus and Cochrane databases for randomized controlled trials published between 2010 and 6th/2022 and involving children undergoing MRI who received DEX as sedative medication. The records which met the including criteria, after indexing via the PRISMA chart and assessing for bias, were processed, and a meta-analysis was carried out with the random effects method. Results: Thirteen studies were included. Out of 6204 measurements obtained, in 4626, it was planned for the participants to only receive DEX (measure group) as an anesthetic drug throughout the procedure. The participants’ mean age was 57 months (Ι2 = 4%, τ2 = 0.5317, p = 0.40). A total of 5.6% (95% CI: 0.6–14.1%, I2 = 98%, p < 0.01) of the patients needed a second dose of DEX. In total, 6% (95% CI: 1–15%, I2 = 93%, τ2 = 0.0454, p < 0.01) required the administration of another drug, besides DEX, to complete the imaging (sedation failure). The effectiveness of the only-DEX method was 99% (95% CI: 97.5–100%, I2 = 81%, τ2 = 0.0107, p < 0.01). The whole rate of adverse events was 15% (95% CI: 9.3–21.5%, I2 = 92%, p < 0.01). Hypotension was reported in 8.7% of the cases (95% CI: 3.1–16.4%, I2 = 84%, p < 0.01), hypertension in 1.1% (95% CI: 0–5.4%, I2 = 89%, p < 0.01), bradycardia in 10% (95% CI: 4–18%, I2 = 95%, p < 0.01) and desaturation in 1.2% (95% CI: 0–4%, I2 = 68%, p < 0.01). There was no statistically significant incidence in respiratory rate decrease (comparing the children who received DEX to their baseline). Five cases of vomiting and one of apnea were recorded. Conclusions: Given that DEX seems to be an effective as well as respiratory and hemodynamically safe drug, it may be a future spotlight in (pediatric) sedation for imaging procedures such as MRI.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Reference41 articles.

1. Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Propofol;Sahinovic;Clin. Pharmacokinet.,2018

2. Electronic Medicines Compendium (EMC) (2023, April 24). Propofol 10 mg/mL (1%) Emulsion for Injection/Infusion. Available online: https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc/product/11319/smpc.

3. Electronic Medicines Compendium (EMC) (2023, April 24). Chloral Hydrate 143 mg/5 mL Oral Solution. Available online: https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc/product/8136/smpc.

4. Chloral hydrate: A hypnotic best forgotten?;Gauillard;L’Encephale,2002

5. Clinical pharmacology of midazolam in infants and children;Blumer;Clin. Pharmacokinet.,1998

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3