Abstract
Simulating the mechanical behavior of rubbers is widely performed with hyperelastic material models by determining their parameters. Traditionally, several loading modes, namely uniaxial tensile, planar equibiaxial, and volumetric, are considered to identify hyperelastic material models. This procedure is mainly used to determine hyperelastic material parameters accurately. On the contrary, using reverse engineering approaches, iterative finite element analyses, artificial neural networks, and virtual field methods to identify hyperelastic material parameters can provide accurate results that require no coupon material testing. In the current study, hyperelastic material parameters of selected rubbers (neoprene, silicone, and natural rubbers) were determined using an artificial neural network (ANN) model. Finite element analyses of O-ring tension and O-ring compression were simulated to create a data set to train the ANN model. Then, the ANN model was employed to identify the hyperelastic material parameters of the selected rubbers. Our study demonstrated that hyperelastic material parameters of any rubbers could be obtained directly from component experimental data without performing coupon tests.
Funder
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Subject
General Materials Science
Reference60 articles.
1. Temperature and humidity effect on aging of silicone rubbers as sealing materials for proton exchange membrane fuel cell applications;Chang;Appl. Therm. Eng.,2016
2. Mechanical Behavior of Rubber at High Strain Rates;Roland;Rubber Chem. Technol.,2006
3. Aleksey, D. (1998). Drozdov Viscoelastic Structures, Elsevier.
4. Lakes, R. (2009). Viscoelastic Materials, Cambridge University Press.
5. Gkouti, E., Yenigun, B., and Czekanski, A. (2020). Transient Effects of Applying and Removing Strain on the Mechanical Behavior of Rubber. Materials, 13.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献