Survey Evaluation of Florida’s Freshwater Fisheries Long-Term Monitoring Program

Author:

Bonvechio Kimberly I.12ORCID,Paudyal Ramesh3,Crandall Chelsey3,Carlson Andrew K.4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Florida Fish and Wildlife Research Institute, Freshwater Fisheries Research, 601 W. Woodward Ave., Eustis, FL 32726, USA

2. Florida Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, School of Forest, Fisheries, and Geomatics Sciences, University of Florida, 2295 Mowry Rd, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA

3. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Florida Fish and Wildlife Research Institute, Center for Conservation Social Science Research, 7386 NW 71st St., Gainesville, FL 32653, USA

4. U.S. Geological Survey, Florida Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, School of Forest, Fisheries, and Geomatics Sciences, University of Florida, 2295 Mowry Road, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA

Abstract

Natural resource monitoring programs benefit from routine evaluation. Here, Florida’s statewide Freshwater Fisheries Long-Term Monitoring (LTM) program is used to show how stakeholder surveys can be integral to this process. In 2022, an online questionnaire was sent to internal stakeholders, i.e., state agency personnel who collect, enter, or use freshwater fisheries data for fisheries and habitat management purposes. The survey’s primary objective was to evaluate the program at its 15-year mark; secondary objectives were to compare results with a similar survey conducted at the 4-year mark, compare results among respondents based on experience and functional role, and develop recommendations for strategic initiatives to further improve the program. The survey consisted of 43 questions across six sections of program evaluation: demographics; field sampling; data entry, summary, and reporting; management decision support; programmatic views; and additional input. Respondents generally had positive views of the LTM program, but the survey revealed differences among respondents with different functional roles (e.g., fisheries researchers and managers viewed the decisional value, priority, and sample sizes of LTM data more favorably than habitat managers) while highlighting high-priority future initiatives (e.g., database development). Our results demonstrate the utility of stakeholder surveys as an important step in evaluating monitoring programs.

Funder

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s Sport Fish Restoration Program

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Ecology,Aquatic Science,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Reference32 articles.

1. Monitoring and evaluation in conservation: A review of trends and approaches;Stem;Conserv. Biol.,2005

2. The science and application of ecological monitoring;Lindenmayer;Biol. Conserv.,2010

3. Why most conservation monitoring is, but need not be, a waste of time;Legg;J. Environ. Manag.,2006

4. Monitoring populations of plants and animals;Gibbs;BioScience,1998

5. Bonar, S., Hubert, W.A., and Willis, D.W. (2009). Standard Methods for Sampling North American Freshwater Fishes, American Fisheries Society.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3