Differences in Recreational Fishers’ Motivations for Utilising Two Estuarine Fisheries

Author:

Tweedley James R.1ORCID,Obregón Clara12,Beukes Sarah J.1,Loneragan Neil R.1ORCID,Hughes Michael1

Affiliation:

1. School of Environmental and Conservation Sciences and Harry Butler Institute, Murdoch University, 90 South Street, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia

2. Australian National Centre for Ocean Resources and Security (ANCORS), Faculty of Business and Law, University of Wollongong, Innovation Campus, Building 233 (ITAMS Building), Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia

Abstract

Effective fisheries management requires an understanding of human dimensions. This study elicited the salient motivations for recreational blue swimmer crab and black bream fishing in Western Australia and whether these views differed depending on the fishing location and/or the characteristics of the fisher. Crab fishers were strongly consumption-orientated and aimed to “catch big crabs” and “catch enough crabs to eat”. Furthermore, 91% consumed their catch, with only 2% practicing catch-and-release fishing. In contrast, 81% of black bream fishers did so for the sport/challenge, with the strongest motivation being to catch a bream considerably above legal size and with food only selected by 15% of respondents; most fishers released caught fish. The marked differences between the fisheries for the two species, which co-occur in the same estuaries, are likely driven by the accessible nature of the crab fishery, ease of catching crabs, the low cost of fishing equipment, and their taste. Fishing for black bream, however, requires more expensive equipment, patience, and a greater skill level. Fishers considered crabbing to be as important as other fishing and outdoor activities, whereas bream fishers considered bream fishing considerably more important, reflecting the trophy nature of this fishery.

Funder

FRDC

Recfishwest

Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Ecology,Aquatic Science,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Reference97 articles.

1. Charles, A.T. (2001). Sustainable Fishery Systems, Blackwell Science.

2. The behavioural dynamics of fishers: Management implications;Salas;Fish Fish.,2004

3. Craig, J. (2015). Freshwater Fisheries Ecology, Wiley-Blackwell.

4. Elliott, M., Houde, E.D., Lamberth, S.J., Lonsdale, J.-A., and Tweedley, J.R. (2022). Fish and Fisheries in Estuaries: A Global Perspective, Wiley. Available online: https://www.wiley.com/en-au/Fish+and+Fisheries+in+Estuaries:+A+Global+Perspective,+2+Volume+Set-p-9781119705352.

5. Spellerberg, I.F., Goldsmith, F.B., and Morris, M.G. (1990). The Management of Temperate Communities for Conservation, Blackwell Science.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3