Effects of Two Different Methods of Teeth Grinding on Dental Injuries, Skin Lesions, Growth and Behaviour of Suckling Piglets Compared to a Non-Treated Control Group

Author:

Timphaus Carolin Bernarda12,kleine Kruthaup Franziska Anna12,Freise Fritjof3ORCID,Herbrandt Swetlana4ORCID,große Beilage Elisabeth1ORCID,Fels Michaela2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Field Station for Epidemiology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Hannover Foundation, Büscheler Straße 9, D-49456 Bakum, Germany

2. Institute for Animal Hygiene, Animal Welfare and Farm Animal Behaviour, University of Veterinary Medicine, Hannover Foundation, Bischofsholer Damm 15, D-30173 Hannover, Germany

3. Institute for Biometry, Epidemiology and Information Processing, University of Veterinary Medicine, Hannover Foundation, Bünteweg 2, D-30559 Hannover, Germany

4. Statistical Consulting and Analysis, Center for Higher Education, TU Dortmund University, Vogelpothsweg 78, D-44227 Dortmund, Germany

Abstract

Teeth grinding in suckling piglets is performed on many farms to protect the piglets’ littermates and the sow’s udder from injuries caused by the piglets’ canines and third incisors. In this study, the effects of two teeth-grinding methods on the piglets’ dental health and welfare were investigated. The piglets of a litter were evenly assigned to a treatment: one-third of littermates were ground with a roller grinding head (RG), one-third with a teacup grinding head (TCG), and one-third were not ground at all (CG). A random sample of 100 animals each from the RG and TCG treatment was examined for tooth injuries, i.e., dental pulp openings. Additionally, behavioural analysis was performed (n = 650 piglets), and skin lesions, growth and mortality were determined (n = 1565 piglets). TCG piglets had a lower risk (p < 0.001) of pulp opening than RG piglets (0.08 ± 0.31 vs. 2.67 ± 1.67 opened pulps per piglet). Mortality, growth, skin lesions and behaviour of piglets were not influenced by treatment (p > 0.05). This study showed that both teeth-grinding methods led to pulp openings. If teeth grinding cannot be avoided on a farm, using the teacup grinding head is recommended concerning animal health and welfare.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference38 articles.

1. Wege zu einer gesellschaftlich akzeptierten Nutztierhaltung [Ways towards a socially accepted livestock farming];Spiller;Berichte Über Landwirtsch. Z. Agrarpolit. Landwirtsch.,2015

2. Tierwohl/Tierschutz in der deutschen Schweinehaltung: Wie gehen wir mit den aktuellen Herausforderungen um?;Kemper;Leipz. Blaue Hefte 10. Leipziger Tierärztekongress,2020

3. Zähne beim Schwein: Aufbau, Altersschätzung und Folgen von Zahnkürzungen–eine Literaturübersicht;Beumer;Der Prakt. Tierarzt,2021

4. Neonatal Behavior and Nutrition-Related Mortality in Domestic Swine;Hartsock;J. Anim. Sci.,1976

5. Investigating risk factors behind piglet facial and sow teat lesions through a literature review and a survey on teeth reduction;Chou;Front. Vet. Sci.,2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3