Efficacy and Safety of Oral Neomycin for the Decolonization of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales: An Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial

Author:

Tancharoen Lalita1,Srisomnuek Ananya2,Tiengrim Surapee1,Thamthaweechok Narisara1,Tangkorskul Teerawit1,Thamlikitkul Visanu1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, Thailand

2. Department of Research, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, Thailand

Abstract

Background: Patients with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract are at risk for subsequent infections and transmission, necessitating contact precautions. Neomycin has shown in vitro activity against CRE in 66–85% of isolates. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of neomycin for CRE decolonization. Methods: In this open-label randomized controlled trial, stool/rectal swab samples from high-risk patients were collected and tested for CRE colonization in the GI tract. Patients who had CRE and met eligible criteria were divided into a neomycin group (n = 26; treated with 4.2 g/day neomycin for 5 days) and a control group (n = 26). CRE detection in stool/rectal swabs was performed on days 7 ± 2 and 14 ± 2. Results: The two groups’ baseline characteristics were similar. CRE presence on day 7 ± 2 was significantly lower in the neomycin group (46.2%) than in the control group (80.8%, p = 0.01). Efficacy of neomycin (4.2 g/day for 5 days) for CRE decolonization was 42.8–53.8% by day 7. By day 14 ± 2, the CRE rate in the neomycin group had risen to align with the control group’s rate (73.1% vs. 61.5%, p = 0.56). The neomycin group experienced mild, temporary, gastrointestinal side-effects. Conclusions: Neomycin effectively reduced CRE colonization on day 7 ± 2, but its impact waned by day 14 ± 2. This suggests that neomycin dosage was too low and the duration of treatment was too short for lasting CRE decolonization.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference31 articles.

1. WHO (2023, January 13). WHO Publishes List of Bacteria for Which New Antibiotics are Urgently Needed 2017. 27 February 2017. Available online: https://www.who.int/news/item/27-02-2017-who-publishes-list-of-bacteria-for-which-new-antibiotics-are-urgently-needed.

2. Antimicrobial stewardship and infection prevention-leveraging the synergy: A position paper update;Manning;Am. J. Infect. Control,2018

3. Antimicrobial Resistance Division (AMR) (2023, January 10). Global Antimicrobial Resistance and Use Surveillance system (GLASS) Report: 2022. 9 December 2022. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240062702.

4. National Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance, Thailand (NARST) (2023). Antimicrobial Resistance 2000–2022, National Institute of Health, Department of Medical Sciences.

5. Mortality rate and factors associated with mortality of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infection;Osaithai;Drug Target Insights,2023

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3